I think he's most likely a human who's been made immortal with a separate tie to a mysterious devil power. Like I want to say Devil DF the way Luffy has a Nika DF but Oda's deliberately making it hard to read as a straightforward thing.
There's a chance that Imu is a Lunarian sell out but it's...
You're assigning the imagery and text to Imu vs the abstract idea of events unfolding. You think Imu was sitting there and asking who it was while watching the whole war play out? After they already announced to the entire world that he is the son of Dragon and grandson of Garp? You think he...
Lol no he wasn't. They knew exactly who he was (family history), many he associated with (Nico Robin, Rayleigh), and what he'd done (Alabasta, Enies Lobby, Thriller Bark).
So you don't know. Makes sense because it's just something you made up.
You already know it was said on panel by Brannew. There's no way to move the goalpost, only try to misdirect maybe but... then you'd have to admit to not understanding the concept of implication.
Ass out in the streets...
When?
Meanwhile I have not lost sight of the fact that Shanks has zero confirmed wins over Mihawk and the only dialogue would either imply that their duels were inconclusive or that Mihawk had the advantage.
:milaugh:
This is embarrassing because literally everyone you're interacting with...
Law, King, and others said it for one, not Brannew. But even worse, you're comparing a narration box and SBS comment to dialogue about one character in order prove something not said in any of the above formats regarding another character. "Shanks beat him too many times." You're full of shit lmao
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.