We also see that divine derparture is a cutting technique when he uses it against Oden and Shanks uses against Kid also Roger uses against Imu that guy is really doing it A.) on purpose to generate a click-bait or B.) he really believes what he wrote here.
Is here anything that implies, that it's about blunt and cutting or about technique and non-technique ?.
I think you dont understand that blades actually cut. He wields a sharp sword, so he cuts a man. This is getting interesting. It's about how you wield it, not about cutting and blunting...
Just wiedling a sword doesnt make a swordsman is for BM or King. Roger is a swordsman due him only channeling his attacks with sword if the attack is blunt, slcing like an air canon doesnt change the fact. Mihawk would become an emperor himself if he would be the commander of the Cross Guild...
what you consider a blunt a attack or slicing attack doesnt make you a swordsman or not LOL. Rocks is a swordsman and his slashes are like air canon now what ?. A swordsman is if he uses his sword as main or only arsenal of weapon or not. Thats all: Mihawk, Shanks, Roger,Rayleigh, Rocks, Zoro...
I dont think a 34 year old Roger was a rookie, a 34 year old Roger was already a reputable pirate, he considered "clashed in there youth" thats not rookie the same goes for Garp who was a vice admiral at that time. Rocks was a rookie 56 years ago when he started his crew.
[
I never read such a dumbshit in this forum and I read ton of it but this is even worse than someone thought that Harald doesnt know that Dorry and Brogy are duelling on lil Garden. Its clearly worse. To hear a sharp sword doesnt cut peple awful really really awful.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.