Recent content by M.O

That is why Sanji has not yet managed to awaken Conqueror's Haki. A captain's dream must be greater than any individual belief or dream; that is why Zoro was willing to die in Luffy's place at Thriller Bark, even if it meant sacrificing his own greatest dream. Sanji's character development needs...

Many titles like the strongest swordsman, the strongest man, the strongest creature in One Piece are merely titles, given by people for their achievements and because they are very well-known. Imu fits all three descriptions, yet few are aware of his existence. Within the World Government, only...

Kaidou of the 100 Hostages didn't defeat a single top-tier fighter. He showed plenty of expressions of pain against the Scabbards, Killer, Kid, Law, Luffy, and Zoro, and was ultimately defeated by a Luffy who had just awakened his fruit. He was so irrelevant that Imu didn't even bother trying to...

You guys are jumping the gun. Luffy was saved from death three times in that fight. There isn't a single character right now who could match Imu's performance: fighting Loki alone, then Luffy, then Gaban, and now taking on three or four opponents simultaneously—assuming Gaban stays in the fight...

That’s not going to happen; Imu is going to absolutely thrash Luffy and Loki, and won't leave Elbaf until Sommers and Killingham are dead. I get that you like Blackbeard, but Imu—an 800-year-old villain—is far from being at full power. It baffles me that people think someone who once faced...

Imu took down three Yonko-level opponents: first Loki, then Luffy, and now Gaban. Luffy was saved from death three times during this fight. Which character would perform on the same level as Imu? Blackbeard, who ran away from old man Rayleigh and needed help against Law?

It’s funny how some people say Imu won’t be the final villain, even though the guy isn't even at 100% and has already taken down three Yonko-level opponents single-handedly. Yet, those same people believe the final villain is the guy who ran away from Akainu and Rayleigh.

So, you know that Rocks tied with Harald on his own, right? Gaban, alongside Shanks, should be able to kill Harald—even with that "HK" strength boost and regen. And at God Valley, Rocks was caught by Domi Reversi—something Imu didn't even attempt against Gaban; that’s a huge difference.

Gaban isn't on the same level as Rocks. A younger Gaban, alongside Shanks, was unable to defeat Harald. So why was Gaban, when he was younger, along with Shanks, unable to defeat Harald?:Think:

1191 New attack by Imu Break Next Week 1192 Imu says a word Break Next Week 1193 Imu smiles Break Next Week If there were a flashback 1191 1192 1193 Break Next Week

So, Nemesis is a black sword?

Just look, the vast majority will dismiss this flashback. Look how many comments the last chapter had, not even 1/3 of the last chapters. Nobody cares about a flashback of a character introduced now, someone Brook never mentioned and now becomes relevant? Especially in the middle of the main...

Nobody wants to know about Brook's past, much less Gunko's, who nobody knew existed before this arc. The vast majority want to see the fight between Imu and Loki. Are you kidding me, Oda? Leaving the best and biggest fight in the manga so far offscreen to show the past of a character that no...

I think Shanks captured Loki but didn't defeat him in a fight. Loki referred to Shanks as a coward when he spoke to Luffy. Loki destroyed his father Harald as if it were nothing, the same Harald who wasn't being restrained by Shanks and Gaban. If we follow the logic that normal humans mature...

So Imu also has a black blade, therefore he is the best swordsman in the world. Mihawk's title no longer makes sense.