Recent content by Rivaille

I don’t. Because: 1/ It is not Loki it is Thor 2/ He is part of those One Piece characters that in term of design have everything I like but don’t move me. Like Shiliew or Lucci.

People keep saying that Mihawk title only applies to skill but when someone supposedly stronger than Mihawk use a sword proves that Mihawk is a fraud ? How? Imu can be a stronger swordman and Mihawk the skillest, no? Ain’t it how it works with Shanks ? :risisure:

Not taking the bait :risisure:

Those kind of questions just put in the light Oda’s current short-comings. And especially his self-indulgence. Because yes what is the point for Zoro to call himself the King of Hell when Imu exists? What purpose does it serves narratively or in terms of characterization for the character? For...

And the fact that Imu supposedly consider Harujdin to be more dangerous than Zoro does not ring a bell?

Tbf some people here push that Zoro used invisible ACoC against Kaido and they were not Zoro fans.

As I said last week, I need Imu to beat everyone easily. Anything else would be disappointing.

If Killingham is supposed to be a threat for Sanji he needs a serious boost. Might happen with Imu being there. Otherwise no need to waste time on a rematch with the exact same outcome.

Why not? I expect Imu to defeat the whole island by himself.

I do not think that Zoro will eat a DF but the Sandai might:goyea:

My theory always has been that Mihawk ate the Ito-ito no Mi : version Horus:BigW:

Cavendish is the closest thing that we’ll ever have that look like Alucard in One Piece.

To be honest the horrendous treatment of Zoro narratively wise had to lead to a downfall in popularity. One cannot neglect a character like Zoro for so long and expect him to keep the same popularity.

It was probably just to hype Loki for the reader:kayneshrug: Even tho I don’t doubt that Oda will find an half-ass explanation.:risisure: