His CoO feats are all gag related and situational therefore, useless
Poor argument, all of Sanji's abilities tie into his passion and love including Diable Jambe, and including his heightened sense perceptions when women are in danger
Not to mention he has several CoO feats akin to the ones involving women that do not involve women
Here, let me fire a shotgun's volley of them
Sanji CoO sensing a sniper 16 meters high, this alone shows his unique aptitude, not merely dodging the bullet but locating it's origin instantly before it is fired
[automerge]1715557534[/automerge]
U literally created an entire roller coaster to the question I asked
Your argument was that Sanji's best is CoO, but that doesn't mean his is better than Zoros
My argument was, you could say the same for Zoro, the SBS saying he is best at CoA but this doesn't mean his is any better than Sanjis, using your own logic
But your logic is flawed and just as Zoros CoA > Sanji, Sanji CoO > Zoro
Sanji is supposed to specialise in coo so shouldn’t that make his coo superior than luffy’s according to ur standard ?
It seems we are met with an impasse
Luffy's CoO > Zoros, obviously. Does this mean Zoros CoA > Luffy, Sanji, and Sanji's CoO > Zoro, Luffy?

we are left with 2 interpretations
Either Luffy's Conquerors is actually > Zoros, as well as Luffys CoA and CoO > Zoro and Sanjis; Zoro CoA > Sanji and Sanji CoO > Zoros
OR
All of them specialize in their haki but no statement is made on who's best at what, meaning it's implied Luffy doesn't have better CoC than Zoro, Zoro doesn't have better Coa than Sanji, Sanji doesn't have better CoO than Zoros
The former is the correct interpretation.