Loki having CoC or ACoC would break his character.
The dynamic between Hajrudin and Loki is as follows:
Hajrudin, as the underdog, will inevitably be given something that Loki lacks in order for Hajrudin to ultimately achieve his dream in uniting the giants under his rule. In one piece, haki typically serves as the plot device for underdog characters to rise up.
Koby is a haki specialist, whereas most of the admirals are not.
Luffy and Shanks are haki specialists, whereas Teach is not
Zoro had ACoC, whereas King relied on his special race powers
While Oda does somewhat try to make us sympathetic to Loki, with him likely being victimized by the CDs. It is ultimately Hajrudin that we should root for the most. Hajrudin is effectively a straw hat, being a commander in the grand fleet. It is Hajrudin who is the underdog, whereas Loki was just gifted everything since birth.
Ultimately, I think it makes the most sense for Hajrudin to be revealed as a conqueror in the Elbaf arc. Whereas Loki explicitly is shown not to have this power. This would lead to Hajrudin being recognized as the legitimate King of Elbaf. He can then return in the final war as an ACoC user and fight a holy knight. Oda could also have him face Loki if Loki ultimately allies with Teach to get revenge on Shanks.
The dynamic between Hajrudin and Loki is as follows:
- Loki inherited the ancient giants' physique. He is as big as Oars and hence can wield Ragnir. He also took his father's DF.
- Hajrudin is a runt and a bastard. He has no DF. Yet despite this he has immense willpower and a noble dream.
Hajrudin, as the underdog, will inevitably be given something that Loki lacks in order for Hajrudin to ultimately achieve his dream in uniting the giants under his rule. In one piece, haki typically serves as the plot device for underdog characters to rise up.
Koby is a haki specialist, whereas most of the admirals are not.
Luffy and Shanks are haki specialists, whereas Teach is not
Zoro had ACoC, whereas King relied on his special race powers
While Oda does somewhat try to make us sympathetic to Loki, with him likely being victimized by the CDs. It is ultimately Hajrudin that we should root for the most. Hajrudin is effectively a straw hat, being a commander in the grand fleet. It is Hajrudin who is the underdog, whereas Loki was just gifted everything since birth.
Ultimately, I think it makes the most sense for Hajrudin to be revealed as a conqueror in the Elbaf arc. Whereas Loki explicitly is shown not to have this power. This would lead to Hajrudin being recognized as the legitimate King of Elbaf. He can then return in the final war as an ACoC user and fight a holy knight. Oda could also have him face Loki if Loki ultimately allies with Teach to get revenge on Shanks.
