Status
Not open for further replies.
I keep on saying this, but I’m pretty sure ad COC was probably always supposed to be an immortality counter and not an upgrade COA.

It’s just that Oda couldn’t think of way to have Luffy beat Kaido
I don't disagree Oda always had a purpose in mind for CoC.

I'm saying he didn't know exactly what he wanted and the concept of Haki evolved over time.

It seems clear he didn't intend any form of it to become some basic. Just look at Croc's reaction to BB using basic Armament on Luffy in ch 544.
 
I mean if inanimate objects even agree with gaban on focusing on the only coc users of the strawhat crew then......
A programme that spits out prompts based on user imput spit out a cope prompt based on a cope input:shocked::shocked::shocked:



And LMAO at this
> Innanimate object
Followed by
> Gaban

This might shock you but none of the drawings you see are more alive than chatgpt lol
 
Last edited:

Kizaruber Eats

Joyboy reveal when?
Yeah but people originally believed Zoro let out a CoC burst or smthn

Now it’s far more likely that Asura itself is a Conqueror’s haki related technique

Wouldn’t be surprised if we found it some CoC users have unique applications for it

Observation killing could be Shanks’ thing
Yeah thats what me a former friend expected of CoC for a long time now. I would love it if all of that were true tbh. Have ACOC differentiate from person to person in application/function/form or w/e.
 
1. If Oda hadn't expanded beyond Rayleigh's explanation, that's what it would be, but he did expand, and CoC therefore is a superior version of CoA that makes the latter feel obsolete. He could've made it so CoC Infusion required CoA Imbuement and/or Emission, but it is what is.

2. Sure, but basic Haki doesn't let you see the future. imo, those abilities rarely add anything worthwhile to fiction. I'd rather it to be exclusive to a specific person or two than something the uber strong can potentially unlock.

3. I responded because you owned yourself. You're not the first person to cope with AI in this thread. :suresure:
1. Agree on the first point
2. Except it does. It's literally precog. Basic observation haki grants precog. Precognition is the purported psychic ability to perceive future events, often described as seeing, knowing, or experiencing something before it happen.

3. It doesn't matter your reasoning you still contradicted yourself since you did the very thing that you stated i was focused on. Ain't denying your reasoning for doing it. Just explaining what it also meant .
 
A programme that spits out prompts based on user imput apit out a cope prompt based on a cope input:shocked::shocked::shocked:



And LMAO at this
> Innanimate object
Followed by
> Gaban

This might shock you but none of the drawings you see are more alive than chatgpt lol
I know since they are inanimate

inanimate

Overview
Similar and opposite words
Usage examples
Pronunciation
Main results


Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more



adjective
  1. not alive.
    "inanimate objects like stones"
    • showing no sign of life; lifeless.




So chatgpt which is inanimate is agreeing with gaban whom is inanimate yet you are twisting the words of an inanimate being "gaban" to fit your narrative? Which means you are equally relying on the words of an inanimate thing correct?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top