No, you can be right sometimes and they can be right sometimes.
I always oppose a set of continuum of vision of the world, not specific ideas. (
ex: the far right continuum)
A continuum of ideas means that one idea is always linked to another set of value which is linked to another set of value, which can all form a continuum with bigger sets of value inside other sets of value/continuum.
It's important to understand politics like this or you will think that you can believe anything independantly of you entire belief system. Which is not how it happens in reality. We are the product of our condition of existence and therefore, our belief system is a continuum, a big set of value (with sometimes, exceptions that will potentially link us to more progressive or more reactionnary values systems/continuum)
Again, what I propose is not random ideas, free from any kind of link or coherence. It's a set of value, a continuum of understanding of the world. It is this continuum that is being attacked on this thread because I myself attack the continuum proposed by people.
So when there is an opposition, it's a global one. Not a local. It only become more local when the person I interact with is closer to my continuum/set of value (like a leftist for ex). The closest and similar a different continuum is, the less I will be likely to be entirely right.
On the opposite, the farther and different a continuum of idea and value is, the more likely two person will be to be completely right or completely wrong.
By saying you're right all the times?
I'm not right all the time. The problem is that you guyz have a confirmation biases making you completely ignore the moments when I say that I'm wrong (
even tho, I do it very clearly). The difference between you and me, is that I affirm or refute my own thinking very clearly and very strongly. But contrary to what most people here thinks, I much more careful about my beliefs system than most people here.
In fact, if you take a lot of time, and you REALLY analyze politically the entirerity of what I wrote on this forum.. you will see a BIG evolution in term of politicization. And you will also see that I was already aware at the beginning that there would be this evolution.
At the beginning of the forum, I was a liberal leftist, now I'm a closer to a revolutionnary. I'm literally saying things that I would disagree with back in the day. Little exemple:
No you don't. And you know you don't do that, so why are you lying to people about it?
Every time you claim you WILL self reflect, you clearly DON'T do it, you just say it to bait people into being more lenient with the gobbledygook you spew.
Mate.. I do self reflect. I just don't self-reflect in the way you would like me to do it. If you want me to suddenly respect your political opinion, just know that it is not self-reflection that you are asking,
it's conversion. And I understand, I'm trying to do the same.
But at least I'm honest about it. I don't have to respect your political opinion or understanding of the world, I simply have to know when it's better to shut up. That's all.
Perhaps political debate are friendly discussions for you, but for me,
it's a question of survival.