Controversial Pissing on the temple ruins
- Thread starter Shikoku
- Start date
True. Pretty much every fandom is retarded here. Just a subjective thing that it hit the temple first.
Mind-boggling how even the simplest point keeps going over your head.
You have reversed the chronology and are now arguing against a sequence of events that never happened. Maybe the language barrier really is the problem, so I will hold your hand through it twice: first in English, then in Darija.
Mind-boggling how even the simplest point keeps going over your head.
You have reversed the chronology and are now arguing against a sequence of events that never happened. Maybe the language barrier really is the problem, so I will hold your hand through it twice: first in English, then in Darija.
1. I was debating nik87 in the SSSS thread about Mihawk, Imu, Yoru and the burden of proof.
2. I asked nik87 several questions beginning with “Can you show…” None of them concerned you or Zoro’s bandages.
3. You entered that unrelated discussion yourself. You quoted only the opening words of my question-“Can you show the panel where…”and used them to drag an old argument about Zoro’s bandages into the conversation.
4. I answered the bandage point directly: the bandaging visible around Zoro’s neck in the earlier appearance was absent in the later one. It was either removed between appearances without being shown or drawn inconsistently.
5. I then applied your own behaviour and standards to you. Since you had entered the discussion to smugly call me out over an old statement, I placed your own old statements, failed certainties and double standards in front of you.
6. The Temple thread came afterward and expanded that same examination to several users. It was not created because I was “hurt over Zoro’s bandages.” This is your cope.
You introduced the bandages into an unrelated discussion. I responded to your interruption by exposing the double standards of the person trying to call me out.
7. Even now, instead of answering any of the contradictions, you keep repeating “bandages,” “hurt” and “obsessed.”
This is you repeatedly failing to understand or deliberately avoiding the point.
2. I asked nik87 several questions beginning with “Can you show…” None of them concerned you or Zoro’s bandages.
3. You entered that unrelated discussion yourself. You quoted only the opening words of my question-“Can you show the panel where…”and used them to drag an old argument about Zoro’s bandages into the conversation.
4. I answered the bandage point directly: the bandaging visible around Zoro’s neck in the earlier appearance was absent in the later one. It was either removed between appearances without being shown or drawn inconsistently.
5. I then applied your own behaviour and standards to you. Since you had entered the discussion to smugly call me out over an old statement, I placed your own old statements, failed certainties and double standards in front of you.
6. The Temple thread came afterward and expanded that same examination to several users. It was not created because I was “hurt over Zoro’s bandages.” This is your cope.
You introduced the bandages into an unrelated discussion. I responded to your interruption by exposing the double standards of the person trying to call me out.
7. Even now, instead of answering any of the contradictions, you keep repeating “bandages,” “hurt” and “obsessed.”
This is you repeatedly failing to understand or deliberately avoiding the point.
1. كنت كنتناقش مع nik87 فثريد SSSS على Mihawk وImu وYoru، وعلى شكون خاصو يجيب الدليل.
2. طرحت على nik87 بزاف ديال الأسئلة اللي كيبداو بـ “Can you show…”، وما كان حتى واحد فيهم عليك ولا على ضمادات Zoro.
3. نتا اللي دخلتي من راسك فواحد النقاش ما عندو حتى علاقة بالضمادات. اقتبستي غير أول كلمات من سؤالي—“Can you show the panel where…”—وجرّيتي وسط النقاش واحد الموضوع قديم على ضمادات Zoro.
4. جاوبتك على موضوع الضمادات بوضوح: الضمادات اللي كانوا باينين فعنق Zoro فالمشهد الأول ما بقاوش باينين من بعد. يا إما تحيدو بين المشهدين بلا ما يتبيّن كيفاش، يا إما الرسم كان غير منسجم.
5. من بعد طبقت عليك نفس المعيار ديالك. بما أنك دخلتي باش تحاسبني على كلام قديم، حطيت قدامك حتى كلامك القديم، التوقعات اللي فشلو، والتناقضات وازدواجية المعايير ديالك.
6. ثريد Temple جا من بعد ووسّع نفس الفكرة على عدة أشخاص. ماشي درتو حيت “تجرحت بسبب ضمادات Zoro”.
نتا اللي دخلتي الضمادات فواحد النقاش آخر، وأنا جاوبت على التدخل ديالك وكشفت ازدواجية المعايير ديال الشخص اللي جا يحاسبني.
7. ودابا، عوض تجاوب على شي تناقض من التناقضات، باقي كتعاود نفس الكلمات: “bandages”، “hurt” و“obsessed”.
هادا ماشي رد. هادا غير دليل أنك يا إما ما فهمتيش النقطة، يا إما كتهرب منها عمداً.
2. طرحت على nik87 بزاف ديال الأسئلة اللي كيبداو بـ “Can you show…”، وما كان حتى واحد فيهم عليك ولا على ضمادات Zoro.
3. نتا اللي دخلتي من راسك فواحد النقاش ما عندو حتى علاقة بالضمادات. اقتبستي غير أول كلمات من سؤالي—“Can you show the panel where…”—وجرّيتي وسط النقاش واحد الموضوع قديم على ضمادات Zoro.
4. جاوبتك على موضوع الضمادات بوضوح: الضمادات اللي كانوا باينين فعنق Zoro فالمشهد الأول ما بقاوش باينين من بعد. يا إما تحيدو بين المشهدين بلا ما يتبيّن كيفاش، يا إما الرسم كان غير منسجم.
5. من بعد طبقت عليك نفس المعيار ديالك. بما أنك دخلتي باش تحاسبني على كلام قديم، حطيت قدامك حتى كلامك القديم، التوقعات اللي فشلو، والتناقضات وازدواجية المعايير ديالك.
6. ثريد Temple جا من بعد ووسّع نفس الفكرة على عدة أشخاص. ماشي درتو حيت “تجرحت بسبب ضمادات Zoro”.
نتا اللي دخلتي الضمادات فواحد النقاش آخر، وأنا جاوبت على التدخل ديالك وكشفت ازدواجية المعايير ديال الشخص اللي جا يحاسبني.
7. ودابا، عوض تجاوب على شي تناقض من التناقضات، باقي كتعاود نفس الكلمات: “bandages”، “hurt” و“obsessed”.
هادا ماشي رد. هادا غير دليل أنك يا إما ما فهمتيش النقطة، يا إما كتهرب منها عمداً.
Ohhhhhhhhh my, Fenaker, what do we have here? Are you sure your cute little heart can handle being called a creepy weirdo by your senpai, @Garp the Fist ?
Or are we back to usual tactic of using double standards?
Or are we back to usual tactic of using double standards?
@kekaro @Shikoku
I have one example as well, the "circle jerk" hypocrisy by @Cruxroux
Threads needs tag genius or it gets burried.
I specifically quoted 'replies' not threads. Did I quote you ever for tagging people on thread lmao.
Liking posts which answer the topic is valid lmao, And each one of them can go defend it on their own.
It's you power rangers girlies who can't do it lmao. Set up a 1v1 and you all start disappearing like flies lmao. 'Apes strong together'
Y'all just can't go with tagging someone in an argument lmao.
Out of you all, only @Dragon777 is the only one to actually debate reach a middle ground like stubborn assholes like you lol.
So circle jerk is something when you tag multiple people in an argument to make fun of a single user, right? Alright, his buddy Fenaker few days later:
Weirdly enough, I don't see Cruxroux bitching about this one. Isn't it weird?
I have one example as well, the "circle jerk" hypocrisy by @Cruxroux
Threads needs tag genius or it gets burried.
I specifically quoted 'replies' not threads. Did I quote you ever for tagging people on thread lmao.
Liking posts which answer the topic is valid lmao, And each one of them can go defend it on their own.
It's you power rangers girlies who can't do it lmao. Set up a 1v1 and you all start disappearing like flies lmao. 'Apes strong together'
Y'all just can't go with tagging someone in an argument lmao.
Out of you all, only @Dragon777 is the only one to actually debate reach a middle ground like stubborn assholes like you lol.
Weirdly enough, I don't see Cruxroux bitching about this one. Isn't it weird?
Fenaker and Crux are just special. At least @Orojackson Refugee and @Lor D. Coast and co are funny and aware of what they are doing, but these former two literally share the same brain cell…
Show me how many of them actually took part in it lol.
How many are known to Insult/slander you?
Go on, I'll wait.
For n'th time, we simply ain't like you people blud.
Fenekar still ended up arguing with you alone lol.
Nik whatsoever gave no heed to topic or any insult or slander lmao.
To the matter of fact Fenekar is right over there lol.
You think you made a point when you didn't lol.
How many are known to Insult/slander you?
Go on, I'll wait.
For n'th time, we simply ain't like you people blud.
Fenekar still ended up arguing with you alone lol.
Nik whatsoever gave no heed to topic or any insult or slander lmao.
To the matter of fact Fenekar is right over there lol.
You think you made a point when you didn't lol.
