Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Lol Danawhite as press secretary America is becoming complete joke 
Clown show
Also he is wrong on one thing (the rest is true): Racism is not a "deflection mechanism", it's a pure independant system of domination and oppression that exist BESIDE capitalism.
Capitalism simply uses said domination to further its interests, but the domination is real, exist, and must be treated as a system just like capitalism in the intersections of both dominations (which is why we must be intersectionnals and materialist at the same time)
The rest is perfectly true tho, fascism do serve the interest of the capital. WHich is why you will often see revolutionnary says that fascism does not really exist, only a capitalism in crisis does. (if you noticed, I adjusted myself my viewpoint on this over the years, I'm not fully calling fascism "fascism", but try to use the notion of crisis)
Capitalism simply uses said domination to further its interests, but the domination is real, exist, and must be treated as a system just like capitalism in the intersections of both dominations (which is why we must be intersectionnals and materialist at the same time)
The rest is perfectly true tho, fascism do serve the interest of the capital. WHich is why you will often see revolutionnary says that fascism does not really exist, only a capitalism in crisis does. (if you noticed, I adjusted myself my viewpoint on this over the years, I'm not fully calling fascism "fascism", but try to use the notion of crisis)
**** will tell everyone to read Das Kapital but refuses to even read up on non Marxist socialists like lassalle, nevermind other ideologies
>What do you mean I have to read up what the Founder of Fascism had to say before declaring my definition of fascism
We get it, you just want a "boogeyman" to call your opponents so that you call feel righteous about your positions, but this isn't a hugbox, if you can't argue like an adult fuck off to your mommy and don't spew crap you can get called out on
>What do you mean I have to read up what the Founder of Fascism had to say before declaring my definition of fascism
We get it, you just want a "boogeyman" to call your opponents so that you call feel righteous about your positions, but this isn't a hugbox, if you can't argue like an adult fuck off to your mommy and don't spew crap you can get called out on
A nationalisation doesn't necessarily implies a transformation into a socialist mode of production and class relationships, in the case of fascism, it's more alike a form of control. Hitler, for example, subordinated the bourgeoisiethrough coercions and incentives, yet the mode of production and the class structure stayed the same while worker's organisation were dismantled and the capacity of organisation was reduced.
Fascism can be understood as an authoritarian response of capitalism to its inherent contradiction to survive. It's doesn't abolish capitalism and do not remove its specificities (capital accumulation, exploitation, private ownership, bourgeoisie, working class... ) , it simply uses force, imperialist tools, authoritarism, militarisation and the worsening of class domination to push the entire system into overdrive.
Fascism doesn't resolve any of these contradictions, it worsen them and suppress the possibility for the working class and oppressed populations to rise up.
Racism, even as an independant domination, serves as a direct tool to capitalism. It pushes the resentment of the population against racialized groups and manufactures the consent of the white working class through the alignment of their interest within whiteness.
Thus creating fascism if need be.
Reading is one thing. Understanding is another. We read with our experiences, so I made the choice not to read, knowing full well how bias I would be if I did and how little effect it would have.
My goal is to understand the system, not by reading about it, but by confronting viewpoints and ethics to find the most ethical path. I already explained that praxis many times before. I only read when it is absolutely necessary and when I already understand the point. Which should arrive soon as I think I've reached the limit of what I can understand through simple viewpoint confrontations.
This is the difference between people like me and people like you. I don't stand on knowledge or books, I don't care about them. I stand on my own understanding and the confrontations of the understandingS of others. Which means that I constantly actualize my vision.
If you don't believe me, compare the way I talked in 2021/2/3 and now, you should observe a transition from liberal leftism to marxism.
Fascism can be understood as an authoritarian response of capitalism to its inherent contradiction to survive. It's doesn't abolish capitalism and do not remove its specificities (capital accumulation, exploitation, private ownership, bourgeoisie, working class... ) , it simply uses force, imperialist tools, authoritarism, militarisation and the worsening of class domination to push the entire system into overdrive.
Fascism doesn't resolve any of these contradictions, it worsen them and suppress the possibility for the working class and oppressed populations to rise up.
Racism, even as an independant domination, serves as a direct tool to capitalism. It pushes the resentment of the population against racialized groups and manufactures the consent of the white working class through the alignment of their interest within whiteness.
Thus creating fascism if need be.
Reading is one thing. Understanding is another. We read with our experiences, so I made the choice not to read, knowing full well how bias I would be if I did and how little effect it would have.
My goal is to understand the system, not by reading about it, but by confronting viewpoints and ethics to find the most ethical path. I already explained that praxis many times before. I only read when it is absolutely necessary and when I already understand the point. Which should arrive soon as I think I've reached the limit of what I can understand through simple viewpoint confrontations.
This is the difference between people like me and people like you. I don't stand on knowledge or books, I don't care about them. I stand on my own understanding and the confrontations of the understandingS of others. Which means that I constantly actualize my vision.
If you don't believe me, compare the way I talked in 2021/2/3 and now, you should observe a transition from liberal leftism to marxism.
Last edited:
If you aren't going to discuss like an adult why should I treat you like one?
Hitler was a Pedo with no actual ideology besides hating Jews, legitimately no grounded ideology other than hating Jews, he borrowed Mussolini's policies and Image because he thought it would help him kill Jews , He hated Giovanni, who hated him back and thought Hitler's Raceplay fetish was retarded
Hitler's economic policies were closer to Modern European policies than they were to Syndicalism or Corporazione proprietaria
Hitler was a Pedo with no actual ideology besides hating Jews, legitimately no grounded ideology other than hating Jews, he borrowed Mussolini's policies and Image because he thought it would help him kill Jews , He hated Giovanni, who hated him back and thought Hitler's Raceplay fetish was retarded
Hitler's economic policies were closer to Modern European policies than they were to Syndicalism or Corporazione proprietaria