Worstgen
Toby D. Dog
You don’t know what that word means.
BoaHancocksHusband
@Toby D. Dog After I refine my axioms I shall disprove this statement.
Toby D. Dog
I often wonder if guys like you who make outlandish claims about “factually” and “ontologically” proving something actually believe your own words. As long as you have fun.
BoaHancocksHusband
@Toby D. Dog i never stated factually and to assert so would be a straw man.
Toby D. Dog
I never claimed you did. It was an example. Either way I you literally can’t do what you’re setting out to do here. Have fun.
BoaHancocksHusband
@Toby D. Dog
I'm arguing that on the specific axis of thematic consistency and structural integration, Naruto possesses a more unified set of constitutive properties than One Piece.
I'm arguing that on the specific axis of thematic consistency and structural integration, Naruto possesses a more unified set of constitutive properties than One Piece.
Toby D. Dog
That’s a nice ChatGPT output. You’re not really saying anything. What is structural integration and constitutive properties in this context?
BoaHancocksHusband
@Toby D. Dog It's not a ChatGPT output, it's just basic media analysis using precise terms. Let me translate it into plain English for you since you're confused.
Structural integration=How well Naruto uses its villains, cast and plot vs how Gear 5 ruins this aspect of One Piece.
Structural integration=How well Naruto uses its villains, cast and plot vs how Gear 5 ruins this aspect of One Piece.
Toby D. Dog
My guy, you’re talking to a media and communications major. I usually don’t take anything you say seriously, but this is peak delusion if you think these are actual terms used for media analysis. Fancy language is not inherently communicative. Then again, you’re not the first worstgener to claim to be an expert in something they know nothing about, especially when it comes to media.