Worstgen
ZenZu
Disagree since G4 boundman is more mobile, has a higher attack rate, higher AP, and was still shown in a losing light as Cracker was the one pressuring him. Having said that Law always stands a chance with a shambles combo and other shenanigans.
Cinera
I think the crux of our disagreement would be the higher AP part.
For Zoro, I explained why I think he can pull it off in these two posts (the second one is much shorter, so if you're pressed for time, please read it instead):
For Zoro, I explained why I think he can pull it off in these two posts (the second one is much shorter, so if you're pressed for time, please read it instead):
Cinera
The first one is much more detailed and makes the point in better detail, but the second covers the most important part I think.
Cinera
For Law, he can teleport around Cracker's biscuits, or simply use the Vergo slash to cleave right through Cracker and his biscuits. Cracker's COA was not impressive enough to assume he could tank a full power slash from Law.
Cinera
Cracker's COA did not receive superlative portrayal compared to Luffy (he was unable to pierce Tankman with a Honeyed Pretzel and failed to pierce base Luffy with a Pretzel Roll executed by his biscuit sword).
Cinera
This version of Luffy didn't really have impressive COA showings. There's not much reason to assume his COA is any stronger than Vergo's.
Cinera
If Cracker can tank a slash from Law in his small island sized room, then he wins, but otherwise I don't see him pulling it off.
ZenZu
I'll check it out. I think the difference lies in the type of attack, Zoro has greater AOE, but we saw how much force a Kong Gun alone has when it sent Mingo flying kms back. KKG is also over anything Zoro has shown. If Cracker could pressure Boundman who has counters by flying around biscuit soldiers with speed and strength that was ragdolling Doflamingo, hard for me to imagine Zoro faring better.
ZenZu
With the Vergo slash it depends. Law has to get lucky if the fight starts in his biscuit. Cracker went under a Kong Gun. The slash can easily miss Cracker's main body. And once it does Cracker approaches the fight differently.
ZenZu
You can apply the same thing to Zoro. Its not like G4 Boundman couldnt break his biscuits in a hit or two either. That didn't stop Cracker from pressuring him.
Cinera
Boundman's attacks have much less AOE than Zoro or Law's slashes. If Zoro and Law can cut through the Biscuit soldiers, it's very possible they cut through Cracker as well on their first strike (given how large their AOe would be).
Cinera
But it's not like Cracker can effectively boost his defense. Against Boundman he was regenerating his biscuit soldiers to tank a Kong Organ. Zoro and Law can have over a kilometre in range, their slashes could cleave through Cracker's biscuit soldiers and Cracker himself. He cannot stall the same way he did for Boundman.
ZenZu
One thing I'll give you is that greater AOE def has its advantages in this battle. I don't think it's impossible, but I'm not going to give them the benefit of the doubt of being able to defeat an opponent who was laughing in boundmans face. Law's chances are higher thanks to hax and catching Cracker offguard.