Worstgen
Zenos7
this sounds like its coming from an actual conspiracy nutjob. GJ
Jew D. Boy
LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION
ICE CREAM SUNDAES BEGIN AT THE BANANAS
TEACH THE CONTROVERSY
ICE CREAM SUNDAES BEGIN AT THE BANANAS
TEACH THE CONTROVERSY
Zenos7
I think i still kinda agree with the first though....
SmokedOut
Sir, your tin foil hat just arrived in the mail today
Zenos7
@SmokedOut Epic, i should be getting mine in the next few days (amazon prime FTW)
SmokedOut
Haha can't beat that prime. I do however think 5G is more harmful to us than they're telling us
Zenos7
why should it be harmful though?
SmokedOut
Being exposed to prolonged levels of radio frequency isn't what the human body was designed to withstand. The big C could result in that exposure.
Zenos7
@SmokedOut but we already are exposed to radio frequency, are we not withstanding that? (and designed by who?)
And how would 5G be different if we already are exposed anyway?
And how would 5G be different if we already are exposed anyway?
SmokedOut
Yeah we are, but this is a higher level of exposure. I'm not saying it's factual, but in theory, a greater level directly correlates to increased chances of cancer
Zenos7
higher level in what sense?
SmokedOut
Higher levels and exposure of rf radiation
SmokedOut
Rf = radio frequency
Zenos7
@SmokedOut You mean as in its a higher frequency? Or why higher levels?
SmokedOut
I mean 5G is more powerful than the previous generation of RF i.e. 4G. More power, more distance and land area covered, more exposure, faster data coverage all = higher levels frequency/radiation
Zenos7
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EUv-RNEWoAEVmD2.png in terms of frequence, its using an interval that we are already exposed to. And with the microwave you can maybe have some local heating, as with some microwave devices, but they are used in a way to maximize engergy output to cook food, so its not exactly comparable.
Zenos7
And even higher frequency will get you to infrared, which is already massively in practice as well. But remote controls are not exactly dangerous either afaik. . .
SmokedOut
As previously stated, its all a theory with little factual information. Here is some additional info: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/%3famp
The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies RF radiation as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.
The studies are producing different results, so the findings are inconclusive for now
The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies RF radiation as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.
The studies are producing different results, so the findings are inconclusive for now
Zenos7
But as the article points out as well, coffee is also classified as "possibly carcinogenic to humans". And as i also mentioned " the vast majority of frequencies being used for 5G have been used in the past for other things". So 5G really doesnt seem to make that much of a difference, at least not if frequency level is the argument.