Search results

This made me physically uncomfortable.

Moneyyyy...

Wut?

In what I am sure will be a surprise to many, I am starting to question any form of legitimacy to Israel's claims. I still believe in the concept of defending one's borders AND retaliation against terrorism, but having watched this situation for months now, I am starting to see the writing on...

The name, for one.

And what a stain on humanity that was.

I donno man, it's almost like... there is a bias. Nah, couldn't be - progressives (more often to be the extreme athiest types) are too enlightened to hold any biases... or fears of repercussion from other religion's adherents...

I think that is an over-focus on idealism rather than pragmatism. When you want to believe in the good of the world you can become myopic. It's a pure way of seeing the world, and you cannot fault the hearts of people who truly think that way. However, what you can do, is pick at the flaws in...

That doesn't even surprise me. Many left-leaning individuals believe in looking good over being good. As such, they like the clout of being seen as people who BELIEVE in others, even when it's clear that a lot of felons are just going to recommit against the innocent.

"When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." - John 8:12. It's true. Praise Him. **Edit - @Herrera95 could you ever say anything more bad-faith than "pro-gun is a woke policy"...

The right to protect yourself should be. I don't think there is anything good about a government preventing people from being able to arm themselves, at least within the confines of their own property.

Then we're opposed on that point. Ultimately, I don't think prohibiting weapons makes the world safer. Just gives despots the chance to be armed when you cannot be. As for conditions? I'm torn on that. Probably a myriad of personality disorders (primarily cluster-B ones), Dementia (as I have...

You mean when you're deemed mentally unfit? Then that should extend to 'at home'. With an individual who is of sound ability to own a gun goes outside with it illegally, then that is a calculated risk; allowing someone who has clear psychological issues to have a gun at home is not. We cannot...

Home protection (private land). Public carry should ideally be only for those in high-risk jobs/situations that require it. At the same time, America has proven its somewhat necessary to have concealed carry. But private property gun ownership should be allowed 100%.

I don't think owning a weapon is necessarily a problem. It's the lack of stringent controls. It's not really "phobic" to say that we need comprehensive testing to prevent those whom have potentially disastrous mental health conditions from having guns. For their sake and those around them.

Then we are of accord. Not 100%. But enough for me to be satisfied with the outcome. Cheers. As for your ongoing issues with psychiatric care, I feel you. I hope you aren't too up against it.

That is actually incorrect. I have full breasts from Hrt which is not reversible without surgery - and surgery comes with it's own risks, Logiko. It is one of the risks, but I think people (doctors) gloss over this during consultations. They certainly did with me. I dislike this phrasing. We...

I added that I may not have been fair about not ever admitting you are wrong. (Post my original comment - I apologise). I was not being psychophobic. I'm not a doctor, obviously, but calling out traits and behaviours that are making you (at least somewhat) socially ostracised comes from a place...

Fair, it's not like I am here 24/7, so I must have missed that. Apologies on that, I guess it wasn't entirely fair.

I literally can't.... you literally said "saying you are far right is not an insult" and, whilst it is true, nobody believes you don't mean it as one, my guy. I have no psychophobia - don't even try that. In fact, I remember telling other people to *not* talk shit about your condition. The 1%...