It kind of sets the precedence
Especially when it comes to justifying anything in the name of "war on drugs"
Can't wait for Trump to actually invade mexico and people here will make excuses of "well mexican government is kind of corrupt"
Sudan Syria and Libya lmao, westerners pretended that those countries became "good" once the "anti western" regimes got toppled
South Sudan and Ukraine too, one has a Million deaths from a civil war, the other is Russia No.2 in terms of corruptions but it's okay because it wants to sell it's...
Problem is that Civilians angry at their conditions (for good reasons) don't really have a grasp at what will replace the systems that they are angry with
There's also the fact that Pro Western "opposition" always just say PR stuff for Western Audiences and then once western Media turns around...
You kind of have fallen into the Sam Harris Narrative of "America's society is more liberal so it's foreign Policy is morally good"
It's a narrative that heavily ignores many things
Biggest problem is that you end up with two dictators
With the ONLY difference being if they serve western interests or local interests
Yeltsin was a bastard but Western Media tries to whitewash him because they dislike Putin who's also a bastard
For people who simply want a better world...
Nothing is more pathetic than watching beta male NPCs pretending that Jestermaxxing works and that Stacys and Stacylites care if Chads bad one liners are funny or not
@Mathias
How do you justify your country's ally using Abu Bakr's quote to demand total submission from his people?
Is that something a country head should be saying in the year of 2025?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.