Because you conflate socialist policies with socialism as a whole, yet don’t do the same with capitalism.
you don’t see a flaw here?
1767655386
Yes because in a Marxist world view a small gas station owner is oppressing their employees.
and you don’t have to be exploitative to implement a capitalist policy… yet here you are saying capitalist unfettered leads to suffering while socialist doesn’t?
1767654386
Wait, do you think only rich people own business? You understand what I meant by private property right?
Anyways you said...
To suffer under socialism you don’t need an incompetent or authoritarian regime. You let it run wild like capitalism and eventually you’re in whatever utopia Lenin wanted. Except in the real word you’re dirt poor and starving
You realize, literally what we’ve been saying it’s here?
This literally tells you that it’s for the abolishment of capital and private property lmao. How exactly does one get there? Oh yeah authoritarianism
it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. Unfettered socialism just ends finishing in a poor...
Just your definition
for example I am for
A national health service
Progressive taxes, specially on the rich
Strong workers rights
Regulations
Government stake in energy industries
what would you call me
1767653024
I’m talking about previous murder of capital owners in societies that...
Marxist-lenism necessitates a one part rule and so does maoism, authoritarianism is a feature of it not something different.
China actually only improved their economy after opening up their markets to the west, aka “capitalizing”. Do you attribute that to capitalism as well?
I don’t associate...
Socialist love their no true Scotsman fallacy
when you suffer under socialism is because of anything but socialism got it
if this is true show me a non suffering socialist society
In order to for libertarian marxism to work you need to convince people to become socialist…aka what I said lmao
brother I don’t know what to tell you, time only moves forward. Using pre-neolithical societies to push for your economic system is like me using the great Roman Empire to push for...
Libertarian Marxism aka let’s hope everybody becomes a socialist in order for our society to work?
Honestly anything tied to libertarian principles is dumb
Yet there’s literally calls for the shah in recent protest?
it’s not supposed to be rational. When people are living like shit they just want a better living condition. Many ascribe that to the times of the Shah
also religion is cringe. Nobody cares about that shit
I’ve seen plenty of videos of Iranians calling for the shah
it’s just a matter of nostalgia, they associate the “good” times with the former regime
@TheAncientGorosei :risisweat:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.