Search results

ok wall-kun

when on earth did i deny that, you quoted me saying the exact same shit bro, but that doesn't justify banning guns as a whole restricting them whilst dealing with those retards as a whole is more sensible.. even in Europe where gun availability is tight roped the "retarded" just resort to knives...

true less deaths are better than mass deaths but not a solution tot he problem, less efficient weapons would now be the primary resort hence used for more attacks in general and just result is relatively similar deaths to weapons even if more less efficient restriction on guns and its mass...

i dont get how can your comprehension be this bad even having this explained this 3 times Banning guns won't reduce violence it'd just continue through a less efficient substitute.

Ok restrictions sure but straight up banning them? i doubt many states have it banned if gun violence is preferable to perpetrators.. wouldn't the preference just change if the underlying reason for violence remains ? Just look at Europe, their statistics are flipped where Knife violence is...

this again. Look gun restrictions are a different subject.. diametrically banning them is a whole separate issue. if you want the massacres to stop banning weapons would do no good.. this would still leave violence some space whats more sensible is to find the core to the violence and...

of what you want is less people being killed then sure.. if you want no. people being killed then cap

regarding the mass school shooting blaming the weapons for such abhorrence isn't the least pragmatic. banning the weapons doesn't decimate the motivation and intentions it'll just change the weapon of mass murder.