By the most obvious deduction, Shanks wasn't that good using cuts/swordsman and that meant he didn't win his duels with Mihawk, so the manga always emphasizes that Mihawk's sword skills (cuts) are superior to Shanks' skills, manga never said that Mihawk was stronger than Shanks.
After Shanks...
I'm talking about it here:
This is clearly Shanks destroying the weapon.
this is a cut:
Now explain to me, if Kamusari is a cut, why isn't it cutting Kid????? Y'all know this isn't a cut, but you're playing dumb
lmao, +1000 chapters and they don't know what a cut is.
Shanks was literally destroying the weapon with the attack and Kid's cannon was literally shattering, if it was a clean cut it wouldn't be possible.
1679617100
See, Luffy didn't destroy Doffy's ropes, he cut them in half...
WB is a swordsman too now? lmao
It is very clear in the manga that those considered ''swordsmen'' are the characters who use slashes/cuts as their primary source of power.
The same way WB used his bisento to trigger earthquakes. Roger and Shanks use the classic and symbolic pirate sword, this...
Roger and Shanks literally don't cut and is that happens in the manga.
WB bisent was also a blade, but he didn't use slashes, he used his weapon to channel his earthquakes
Fujitora also doesn't use his sword to slash, but to channel his gravity power
Roger and Shanks are using their weapons...
Like Roger, he uses haki to crush his opponents, not cutting skills.
Oda has already said twice in the manga (through Daz Bones and King) that having a sword is not self-sufficient to be declared a swordsman.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.