Theres a difference between something thats "official" and misinterpreting the words of the work itself. For example you bring up another tekkai example while in the same chapter just a few pages later this happens
Would this shigan move be classified as tekkai following your logic despite him...
But nothing confirmed it or even retconned. All of the Rokushiki still relies on physical strength while haki is spiritual by nature.
Thats fine, doesn't change that your still taking Jinbes comment out of context. Jinbe suggested his armament is similar to tekkai as it serves as a transition...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.