Search results

Yeah but Luke could have done that to protect from a secret evil in the jedi temple or something, not a complete 180 of his character, willing to kill a kid come on. But yeah, whatever.

It's not elaborated in the movie, and I still think that I should not read other media for a movie to not break all lore. Yeah, completely valid. Yet, they didn't force him to direct with a gun to his head. So he is the maker of his own fall.

TLJ, for me, has a terrible flaw. I can ignore most things, nitpicking is for assholes since it can be done to any piece of media. But the whole "suicide maneuver" in the end, just by existing, invalidates the plot of episode 4, 6 and 7. If you can destroy ships like that, then nothing prevents...

I would argue that "at least they are different" is much more true for the prequel. The sequel are non-sequitur mish mash of unrealised idea, full blown copy and absolute terrible acting. There is no arch for anyone, there is no plot, there are actually no characters. It's abysmal that people...

It may sound like that, if I read it again. But I was just trying to say that something "being different" is not a good reason for it to be good, could have phrased it better though. The point still stands. Btw Star Wars as a whole is Mediocre at best.

I did not say the movie was shit, I said that praising something just because it's different is stupid. As for me, I don't even like Star Wars in the first place.

If i want to try something different for dinner doesn't mean that i have to enjoy eating shit. 1675886453 It's not subversion, it's character contradiction Luke saw his father's good when he was darth vader, but he wants to kill a young boy because he is afraid what he migjt become. Pure...