WB's statement wasn't prescriptive, it was descriptive
Its not that Teach, in theory, can't be joyboy
Its descriptive: Teach isn't joyboy
In some alternate universe where Teach encounters Luffy instead of Ace and steals his DF, maybe then Teach could have been Joyboy.
That's not what he said tho. He said Blackbeard wasn't the one that Roger was waiting for. From the Oden flashback we know this is joyboy. Basically, WB is saying that Teach isn't Joyboy. Teach isn't the man who will change the world.
There is no implication that some people should not be...
I think the Kid pirates might learn ancient kingdom science in elbaf.
Kid uses a rail gun and builds mechs with his DF
Killer’s scythes are attached to mechanical gauntlets that he rotates
Kid’s #3: Heat, breathes fire via some unknown means(probably not a DF)
Learning ancient kingdom science...
Doesn’t make sense imo
The admirals are supposedly the WG’s strongest forces.
Which is why I say that the adult seraphim will be Imu’s top commanders. It’s going to be a skypiea parallel.
Imu=“God”
Seraphim are the servants of God in mythology.
This could legit be something Oda does ngl. 2 out of 3 of Luffy’s top commanders are inhuman.
jinbe is a fishman
Sanji is a mutant
What is Zoro? Why can he use asura, an ability literally no other person has shown?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.