Search results

There's no point in continuing with you. You've already lost the argument, and now, you're repeating things (which have been debunked) as if you're an AI Dungeon character.

You have some serious mental problems if you're going to repeat debunked talking points. It's not made-up rules. It's literally shown in the manga. Luffy fights the same way he did since chapter one even with Haki. Again, repeating debunked talking points.

Haki is under every fighting style. 1661911218 What's the big deal? It's a fight where Mihawk held back, and Mihawk asking for postponement is incorrect. He suggested Vista to end the fight. Marco and co. didn't have their hands tied with Akainu, and there were instances of individual...

Yeah, @Rootbeer and @uyuu are clearly in a state of mind where they're grasping at straws for a dying viewpoint. It's best we let the manga destroy them.

So you agree, Zoro's incorporating CoC into his swordsmanship.

Reread Zoro VS King.

Which makes him excel at swordsmanship like how it made Luffy excel at the fighting style he had since ch. 1.

The Vista excuse? Really? These prove Mihawk being weaker than Shanks how? It's not denial if it was never true to begin with, and Kaido is including pirates he's interacted with, no shit Mihawk's not there. Yes, you are making up rules. You seem to think there needs to be panels of Mihawk...

That's just me pointing out those aren't actual arguments. Show me an Admiral dealing with Mihawk. It is irrelevant. Not having panels of Aokiji doing X or Y at Mihawk's presence literally does nothing to prove your point. You're just making up rules, meaning you have fake arguments.

Irrelevant. Also irrelevant. Or Zoro losing his CoC without his sword. That's not going to work. Mihawk had a cold sweat over Shanks? Another irrelevant statement. Not my fault you're repeating debunked talking points like a broken record. Maybe get some new material. Never said...

That's not actual confirmation, that's confirmation bias.

No he hasn't. That is the stupidest fucking question ever. Everyone fights best with Haki. Their main fighting style is still swordsmanship unless proven otherwise.

It does if my conclusions are outright from the manga and yours isn't. Does Shanks fight best with swordsmanship? Yes or no. (Swordsmanship imbued in Haki still counts.) I've debunked this point. So Roger is still a swordsman? Great. Thanks for proving nothing but my point.

That's like saying swordsmanship enhances physical strength; at the end of the day, it's STILL swordsmanship. And Roger's fighting style is still swordsmanship. Garp's fighting style is still brawling. Luffy's fighting style is still brawling with Devil Fruit abilities. Haki is an enhancer...

No, the Haki makes the swordsmanship more powerful. It is STILL swordsmanship if you boost it with Haki. It's like saying Zoro never proved better swordsmanship to previous opponents because his physical strength did most of the work. Your logic here is a mess. (1) Kaido has attacks outside...

Channeling CoC into a sword is still swordsmanship.

Haki is NOT a fighting style. Haki is PART of swordsmanship. If Shanks and Mihawk's fighting styles strictly revolve around swordsmanship and Shanks has better Haki, Shanks is the better swordsman.

Vivre Card said he rushed into Mihawk despite knowing how powerful he is, which implies he knows Mihawk is significantly stronger.

Yeah, I made that point before. It never said they had equal swordsmanship nor strength, just that they had an equal clash (referring to that scuffle where Mihawk clearly held back). That same Vivre Card outright implies Vista knows Mihawk is significantly stronger than him.