Search results

The op fandom has reached new lows. This ain't even funny no more:pepecafe: 1680069751 Apparently there are cutmen and CoCmen now. Would be easier to call sword users swordsmen, but meh

:kailaugh::kailaugh::kailaugh:

The debate usually ends up in a new definition of WSS. It's not the strongest person wielding a sword, but how aesthetically pleasing the style is to the eye Or someone that relies solely on a sword, and doesn't use haki, sandals, arms or legs lol

No point arguing with the guy lol. If he wants to believe Shanks is a sword-wielding hakiman, so be it

Shanks doesn't cut, he simply hits with his sword. Very simple

Occam's razor: the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. He uses a sword, and is the WSS' rival. No need to write phd dissertations on why he's a haki blunt no slashman

"It wasn't a cut, he just hit him with his sword":pepecopium:

Mihawk stocks are a very safe investment

A tough one for sure, since both are equally funny. The former implies WSS is a dance recital; the latter features glorious arguments such as "Blunt sword attack not a slash"

Blunt sword attack has to be the funniest reason I've read for Shanks not being a swordsman:kailaugh: 1679607663 As though they're gonna draw anyone getting cut in half lol.

The One Piece is Shanks' missing hand

Technically everyone's a handman 1679541434 Can't argue with that

1000th thread on this topic, but lemme get that platinum thread :pepebusi: If he is, all feats from Shanks automatically go to Mihawkbros