Powers & Abilities Destroying the myth: Named attacks are superior to no named attacks

[HA001]

Zolo hyping up Lunarian defenses only helps my ''there is no such a thing as named attack > no name attack'' argument.

Did Alber need to block no name attacks of Zolo? Yes.

''There is no such a thing as named attack > no name attack'' becasuse even Alber with hyped up defenses had to block it just like he blocks named attacks. No difference. Confirmed and debunked you again.

Lucci blocking Zolo's green flames attacks is no different than blocking Zolo's named attacks with green flames.

Sure shanks no name no haki swing > divine departure

 

[Erkan12]

Sure shanks no name no haki swing > divine departure

Never said this shit lmao.
Literally showed Daishinkan = no haki attack which is weaker than Zolo's no name Haki imbued attacks :

Zolo's no name Haki imbued attacks (without even green flame or lightning) made Alber block:

As long as we know he is using Haki to attack, there is no such a thing as Named attack > no name attack.

Zolo is also using green flames here as an extra compared to his attacks to Alber, Lucci takes on attacks that made Alber block and still takes 0 damage:

 

[HA001]

Never said this shit lmao.
Literally showed Daishinkan = no haki attack which is weaker than Zolo's no name Haki imbued attacks :

Zolo's no name Haki imbued attacks (without even green flame or lightning) made Alber block:

As long as we know he is using Haki to attack, there is no such a thing as Named attack > no name attack.

Zolo is also using green flames here as an extra compared to his attacks to Alber, Lucci takes on attacks that made Alber block and still takes 0 damage:

Clashing =/= attacks

 

[Erkan12]

Clashing =/= attacks

English lessons:
Lets read;

''Why bother blocking my ATTACKS?''

Look at the middle panel of Zolo vs Alber, sound effects; ''gaching'' or ''clang''.

Literally same sound effects here as well while Zolo ATTACKING Lucci by using green flames;

 

[HA001]

English lessons:
Lets read;

''Why bother blocking my ATTACKS?''

Look at the middle panel of Zolo vs Alber, sound effects; ''gaching'' or ''clang''.

Literally same sound effects here as well while Zolo ATTACKING Lucci by using green flames;

Which he did vs hyouzou too lmfao

 

[Erkan12]

Which he did vs hyouzou too lmfao

No he didn't,

no name Haki barrier he just blocks:

he wasn't attacking Hyouzu. He was blocking:

''blocking every single attack''

He is attacking both Alber (without green flames) and Lucci (with green flames)

''why bother block my attacks''

 

[HA001]

No he didn't,

no name Haki barrier he just blocks:

he wasn't attacking Hyouzu. He was blocking:

''blocking every single attack''

He is attacking both Alber (without green flames) and Lucci (with green flames)

''why bother block my attacks''

This got debunked in egghead flame on king doesn't need to block.

Same thing happened vs killer apoo
Nameless clashes mean nothing

None of Hyouzu killer apoo lucci can take a real attack from zoro

 

[Erkan12]

This got debunked in egghead flame on king doesn't need to block.

Same thing happened vs killer apoo
Nameless clashes mean nothing

None of Hyouzu killer apoo lucci can take a real attack from zoro

Zolo hyping Lunarian defense is not something new. It doesn't change the fact Alber blocked Zolo's no name attacks.
Zolo himself says his no name attacks forced Alber block him, you still denial of manga lmao. Of course it means a lot as Zolo himself said it.
There are tons of examples of no name attacks = named attacks , or even examples of no name attacks > named attacks, which debunks your nonsense.

 

[HA001]

Zolo hyping Lunarian defense is not something new. It doesn't change the fact Alber blocked Zolo's no name attacks.
Zolo himself says his no name attacks forced Alber block him, you still denial of manga lmao. Of course it means a lot as Zolo himself said it.
There are tons of examples of no name attacks = named attacks , or even examples of no name attacks > named attacks, which debunks your nonsense.

But they haven't. As no attack zoro does will hurt flame on king confirmed by egghead zoro debunking you.

Shanks no haki attack > divine departure

 

[Erkan12]

But they haven't. As no attack zoro does will hurt flame on king confirmed by egghead zoro debunking you.

Shanks no haki attack > divine departure

Debunk me? Or debunk the manga itself? Thats just you can't read as usual.

Look above, you were saying clashes =/= attack, Zolo literally says ATTACKS which debunked you;

Zolo still hyping Lunarian defense later in Egghead doesn't change the fact Zolo no name attacks forced Alber to block, it won't erase this manga page and other tons of examples that shows no name attacks = named attacks.

 

[HA001]

Debunk me? Or debunk the manga itself? Thats just you can't read as usual.

Look above, you were saying clashes =/= attack, Zolo literally says ATTACKS which debunked you;

Zolo still hyping Lunarian defense later in Egghead doesn't change the fact Zolo no name attacks forced Alber to block, it won't erase this manga page and other tons of examples that shows no name attacks = named attacks.

He didn't hype it, he outright explained that flame on = invulnerable debunking that panel.

99% of the strongest attacks are named attacks all through the manga

 

[Erkan12]

He didn't hype it, he outright explained that flame on = invulnerable debunking that panel.

99% of the strongest attacks are named attacks all through the manga

He still kept attacking, whats the point of him wasting stamina and Haki then if they have no limits, there is no such a thing as flame on having no limit to his defense. Manga page is there, as well as with Greenbull's, they have limit to his defense thats why Alber BLOCKED Zolo's NO NAME attacks its that simple, which debunked you.

WB never even used named attack, Roger's no name attacks vs WB was stronger than his named attacks vs Oden, there are also many other examples such as Marco not using named attacks always.

Alber's no name attack was stronger than some of his named attacks as well:

 

[HA001]

He still kept attacking, whats the point of him wasting stamina and Haki then if they have no limits, there is no such a thing as flame on having no limit to his defense. Manga page is there, as well as with Greenbull's, they have limit to his defense thats why Alber BLOCKED Zolo's NO NAME attacks its that simple, which debunked you.

WB never even used named attack, Roger's no name attacks vs WB was stronger than his named attacks vs Oden, there are also many other examples such as Marco not using named attacks always.

Alber's no name attack was stronger than some of his named attacks as well:

No they weren't
Albers named attacks on zoro just didn't land like jackpot (which zoro said would kill him)
Or imperial flaming wings which zoro can counter lmfao
Debunked


They don't have a limit as the seraphim were untouched for 24 hours and had to be trapped instead

King was the only one greenbull couldn't drain and we see king is still fine after greenbull in the vegapunk speech chapter

Zoro was mid fight there doing what he could

He knows the truth at egghead

 

[Erkan12]

No they weren't
Albers named attacks on zoro just didn't land like jackpot (which zoro said would kill him)
Or imperial flaming wings which zoro can counter lmfao
Debunked


They don't have a limit as the seraphim were untouched for 24 hours and had to be trapped instead

King was the only one greenbull couldn't drain and we see king is still fine after greenbull in the vegapunk speech chapter

Zoro was mid fight there doing what he could

He knows the truth at egghead

Zolo blocked Alber's no name attack and still took more damage than he took vs Jackpot:

Alber blocked Zolo's no name attacks, thats a fact. Zolo didn't need named attacks to accomplish that another debunk.

Greenbull excuse is pathetic, Alber still got fodderized vs Greenbull's NO NAME attack. Another debunk.

 

[HA001]

Zolo blocked Alber's no name attack and still took more damage than he took vs Jackpot:

Alber blocked Zolo's no name attacks, thats a fact. Zolo didn't need named attacks to accomplish that another debunk.

Greenbull excuse is pathetic, Alber still got fodderized vs Greenbull's NO NAME attack. Another debunk.

He didn't block that he got flung into a wall the wall is what's damaged zoro there not King's sword.
Whilst jackpot KILLS him if he didn't coat himself in haki.

Already debunked

Zoro used a named attack to beat King

Greenbull point debunked you. Only beast pirate that couldn't be drained Fact

 

[Erkan12]

He didn't block that he got flung into a wall the wall is what's damaged zoro there not King's sword.

You were lowballing Teach for SHawk sending him flying? He took 0 damage from this:

How weak Zolo is for getting heavier damage than Jackpot?

Whilst jackpot KILLS him if he didn't coat himself in haki.

Already debunked

Zolo also coated his swords with Haki while blocking Alber's no name attack still took more damage than jackpot. So debunked again.

Zoro used a named attack to beat King

He didn't need to name it, thats the point of this thread LMAO.

Luffy could name his attack vs Hajrudin, or his attack vs Bellamy, or Akainu could name his attack to WB, or WB could name his attacks but they didn't.

The point is naming an attack is optional.

Greenbull point debunked you. Only beast pirate that couldn't be drained Fact

You just took another L. Its irrelevant if he is drained or not, he was bleeding and getting fodderized by Greenbull's NO NAME attack lmao. So there are limits to his defense as he needed to block Zolo's no name attacks and Greenbull's no name attack.

 

[HA001]

You were lowballing Teach for SHawk sending him flying? He took 0 damage from this:

How weak Zolo is for getting heavier damage than Jackpot?


Zolo also coated his swords with Haki while blocking Alber's no name attack still took more damage than jackpot. So debunked again.


He didn't need to name it, thats the point of this thread LMAO.

Luffy could name his attack vs Hajrudin, or his attack vs Bellamy, or Akainu could name his attack to WB, or WB could name his attacks but they didn't.

The point is naming an attack is optional.


You just took another L. Its irrelevant if he is drained or not, he was bleeding and getting fodderized by Greenbull's NO NAME attack lmao. So there are limits to his defense as he needed to block Zolo's no name attacks and Greenbull's no name attack.

King is using haki to send a non haki zoro flying into a wall that damages him

Meanwhile a baby shawk weaker than the egghead version with a no haki flying slash sent fatbeard flying MILES through his haki guard

He named king Kong Gun, king cobra and bajrang gun didn't he you know in the fights that matter lmfao

It was an injured king and greenbull couldn't drain him

 

[Erkan12]

King is using haki to send a non haki zoro flying into a wall that damages him

Meanwhile a baby shawk weaker than the egghead version with a no haki flying slash sent fatbeard flying MILES through his haki guard

He named king Kong Gun, king cobra and bajrang gun didn't he you know in the fights that matter lmfao

It was an injured king and greenbull couldn't drain him

Alber's attack that didn't even cut a small house send Zolo with blocking 2 special swords + Haki flying and gave him more damage than jackpot.

SHawk's mountain slash didn't even scratch Teach with only barehand block.

Where is the names of the attack;

ZKKfans still can't understand how Oda write his manga.

Is this mean Luffy not naming his Snakeman attacks weaker than previous Snakeman attacks?

Zolo with green flames attacks weren't weaker at all, exact same thing.

How long you gonna cry for Greenbull not using name attack and still fodderizing Alber alongside with Queen like nothing he was? Lmao.

You tried to lie about clashing =/= attacks and I debunked your lie once again by showing Zolo himself says he attacks Alber with no name attacks and forced him to block. No different than his named attacks.

 

[Lor D. Coast]

60 year-old virgin always crying, been crying since the early 2000s! :saden:

 

[Loki D. Terror]

Named attacks are stronger in general