It depends on what kind of corporation we are talking about, really. Google is technically a monopoly, despite legislation against it. I agree that overall things would be fairer and more competitive. Don't take that post too seriously. It was meant to troll the users I quoted. Too bad only one took a bite.
Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Only give citizenship to those who are fluent in the language to a near-native level, have culturally integrated (especially if it's via marriage with a citizen), are economically active and a net-positive (benefits/subsidies are lower than the taxation they provide), and are willing to revoke their past citizenship. Dual-citizenship should not be allowed. It actually incentivises people to not see their new home as home, as they can up and leave at any time.
Commit or you don't get citizenship.
I do believe in citizenship for all people who are ethnically from the nation as well (up to a certain generation ago). This applies for all countries. I know Korea does something like this, and I approve. This includes people of half-descent by the way.
I actually agree. I was taking the piss.
Commit or you don't get citizenship.
I do believe in citizenship for all people who are ethnically from the nation as well (up to a certain generation ago). This applies for all countries. I know Korea does something like this, and I approve. This includes people of half-descent by the way.
I actually agree. I was taking the piss.
