I feel like there's been a lot of gaslighting going around in regards to Eustass Kid
I think that up until the rooftop, arguing that Kid was on par with Luffy had some legitimacy. Zoro fans, of course, always argued otherwise because they wanted their favorite to be Luffy's only equal. Then the rooftop happened, Kid was sidelined, and all of a sudden, now I was supposedly delusional all this time for thinking Kid could be on Luffy's level.
When irl literally the entire point of Kid's character was to be Luffy's rival:
- their interaction in sabaody
- having a higher bounty than luffy in sabaody
- having a supernova right hand
- wanting to kill shanks
- having a comparable bounty up until WCI
- having CoC
- their interaction in udon
If Oda didn't want Kid to be Luffy's rival, then he shouldn't have done any of the stuff I mentioned. I figured that this portrayal had to have some sort of payoff, that Oda wouldn't introduce a character like this for the fuck of it. That especially with Kid wanting to kill shanks and become pirate king, there must be some sort of confrontation between the two.
And oda blatantly failed to deliver on his promises. I don't think this is a fanboy take. Why do so many people view Kid as a disappointment, despite him 2v1ing an emperor? Why do so many people think Kid is trash despite having better feats than most other characters?
This isn't the fans fault for misinterpreting the manga, Its Oda's fault for making Kid's role in the story inconsistent with his initial portrayal.