https://x.com/nebulousrk/status/1951846445084201396
I feel like they just distaste anything sanji does and pretend its evidence against the fact zoro =sanji and he is just as important as sanji ( of course i see them try to use nami as a shield because they cant stand that zoro isnt equal to luffy or way above the rest of the crew they desperately want to make zoro equal to luffy when the truth is he never was he is on sanjis level)
I remember a bunch of responses to this going why did you list sanji twice
they pretend sanji being a a cook means he cant be a conqueror or a top tier figher ( that sanji having a role besides fighting means he cant be as strong as the guy whose only role is fighting)
or go but he is a simp when its irrelevent
or go but he doesnt have a dream related to strength or requiring him to fight people which is irrelevent he doesnt need any of those things to be equal to zoro ( which he is
they constantly try to reduce him to just a cook
I remember this and a bunch of response
they try to claim that his rivalry is just a gag
when its supported by narrative portrayal and feats
( thy love to pretend sanji ever getting hit or anything that isnt perfectly clean like him getting kicked by kizaru in a sneak which barely effected him or getting bit by ethan somehow makes him less then zoro it doesnt)
while they try to claim zoro is equal to luffy because of whiskey peak ( which ended in an actual gag and its more meant to show they are monsters luffy not lowdiffing him doesnt make them equals) a
and the gap got way bigger over time.
or go but zoro fought the swordsman guy besides the fact that oda stated he sometimes holds luffy back
luffy has g4 he would destroy both zoro and sanji .
some zorostans go but when zoro loses he still looks good and cool while sanji is allowed to look bad which is irrelevent to the fact zoro vs sanji is extreme diff
some zorostans try to act like sanji not being on rooftop makes him weaker then zoro it doesnt
I remember when some countered that statement by pointing out zoro got kicked off they get defensive and go but he still did cool stuff which is something that can be turned around on them by the fact that its irrelevent that sanji wasnt on the rooftop because it doesnt change that he is close in strength to zoro.
zoro fough king sanji fought queen ( he had an easier time with queen then zoro with king low to mid diffing queen after solving his issues but outside circumstances and using up stamina to counter invisibility made him pass out which doesnt change the fact its a low to mid diff)
zoros feats on rooftop gets overhyped by zorostans claiming he scarred kaido with no adv coc ( he did use it ) and it was a tiny scar
or they act like he fully tanked the combined yonko attack when he held it off for a couple seconds before law pulled him away
saving his life, and he was using his swords to block it didnt hit him directly so the impact from his swords hurt him that badly
)so the could sanji tank the attack is irrelevent
sanji has speed and mobility zoro has ap
I feel like they just distaste anything sanji does and pretend its evidence against the fact zoro =sanji and he is just as important as sanji ( of course i see them try to use nami as a shield because they cant stand that zoro isnt equal to luffy or way above the rest of the crew they desperately want to make zoro equal to luffy when the truth is he never was he is on sanjis level)
I remember a bunch of responses to this going why did you list sanji twice
they pretend sanji being a a cook means he cant be a conqueror or a top tier figher ( that sanji having a role besides fighting means he cant be as strong as the guy whose only role is fighting)
or go but he is a simp when its irrelevent
or go but he doesnt have a dream related to strength or requiring him to fight people which is irrelevent he doesnt need any of those things to be equal to zoro ( which he is
they constantly try to reduce him to just a cook
I remember this and a bunch of response
they try to claim that his rivalry is just a gag
when its supported by narrative portrayal and feats
( thy love to pretend sanji ever getting hit or anything that isnt perfectly clean like him getting kicked by kizaru in a sneak which barely effected him or getting bit by ethan somehow makes him less then zoro it doesnt)
while they try to claim zoro is equal to luffy because of whiskey peak ( which ended in an actual gag and its more meant to show they are monsters luffy not lowdiffing him doesnt make them equals) a
and the gap got way bigger over time.
or go but zoro fought the swordsman guy besides the fact that oda stated he sometimes holds luffy back
luffy has g4 he would destroy both zoro and sanji .
some zorostans go but when zoro loses he still looks good and cool while sanji is allowed to look bad which is irrelevent to the fact zoro vs sanji is extreme diff
some zorostans try to act like sanji not being on rooftop makes him weaker then zoro it doesnt
I remember when some countered that statement by pointing out zoro got kicked off they get defensive and go but he still did cool stuff which is something that can be turned around on them by the fact that its irrelevent that sanji wasnt on the rooftop because it doesnt change that he is close in strength to zoro.
zoro fough king sanji fought queen ( he had an easier time with queen then zoro with king low to mid diffing queen after solving his issues but outside circumstances and using up stamina to counter invisibility made him pass out which doesnt change the fact its a low to mid diff)
zoros feats on rooftop gets overhyped by zorostans claiming he scarred kaido with no adv coc ( he did use it ) and it was a tiny scar
or they act like he fully tanked the combined yonko attack when he held it off for a couple seconds before law pulled him away
saving his life, and he was using his swords to block it didnt hit him directly so the impact from his swords hurt him that badly
)so the could sanji tank the attack is irrelevent
sanji has speed and mobility zoro has ap
