IF he is doind what u say i think it's all part of Hawkins's plan he probably knew about the stuff and prepared this plan of Law going to Orochi and telling him everything (if it's the case)
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
IF he is doind what u say i think it's all part of Hawkins's plan he probably knew about the stuff and prepared this plan of Law going to Orochi and telling him everything (if it's the case)
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
But you realise that Nekomamushi and Inuarashi lost their legs due to this traitor and yasu essentially died because the plan was exposed and now the scabbards are headed to Onigashima alone without back up because of the traitor
You have to consider the ramifications of the traitors actions before making up a theory because THE TRAITOR WILL PAY FOR THIS... Get it? These bad things MUST be attoned for if this traitor is to be redeemed in any way...
So unless you expect Law to NOT get redeemed, then this man MUST pay for these things
Do you honestly expect Oda to be leading up to this? That we have time for Oda to FIRST OF ALL explain why Law betrayed and then explain how he ends up changing his mind and then explain how Law pays for all these actions before getting redeemed.
We are fuckin 60 chapters into this arc and we still haven't gotten the strawhats doing anything and you expect that Oda is gonna spare like 10 chapters for Law on this plot line?
Hehehe, you guys making these theories just want to make shit that sounds interesting without considering how it fits into the actual story... This traitor plot line has led to deaths and countries being destroyed and people getting mutilated and you just pick law to be responsible for all this without considering how many bad things you are proposing Law has led to
You have to consider the ramifications of the traitors actions before making up a theory because THE TRAITOR WILL PAY FOR THIS... Get it? These bad things MUST be attoned for if this traitor is to be redeemed in any way...
So unless you expect Law to NOT get redeemed, then this man MUST pay for these things
Do you honestly expect Oda to be leading up to this? That we have time for Oda to FIRST OF ALL explain why Law betrayed and then explain how he ends up changing his mind and then explain how Law pays for all these actions before getting redeemed.
We are fuckin 60 chapters into this arc and we still haven't gotten the strawhats doing anything and you expect that Oda is gonna spare like 10 chapters for Law on this plot line?
Hehehe, you guys making these theories just want to make shit that sounds interesting without considering how it fits into the actual story... This traitor plot line has led to deaths and countries being destroyed and people getting mutilated and you just pick law to be responsible for all this without considering how many bad things you are proposing Law has led to
A
IF he is doind what u say i think it's all part of Hawkins's plan he probably knew about the stuff and prepared this plan of Law going to Orochi and telling him everything (if it's the case)
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
But most importantly who is that dude? (and no it's not Hawkins cuz he is bleeding in the cell) Can he be Denjiro?
Last edited by a moderator:
I did read it. But Law being a traitor, pretense-wise or not, just doesn't work for me, sorry. It doesn't mesh his character to just oppose his friends and Luffy like that.
Look, you might be laughing at me, but you worded the whole essay very poorly to be honest. You basically want Law to be like X-Drake and join Orochi as a force to undermine him by being part of Sword, right? But the points you made just don't match up. You make it sound like Law is meant to be the bad guy or something. You can't "fake" that when you're hurting people. I mean Law obviously saved his crew because they were no match for Hawkins. He didn't tell the SH because his rescue would risk alerting the beast pirates. Hawkins basically told Law that Orochi is a jerk-face that does whatever he wants with his soldiers, and the bridge/ship thing makes no sense what-so-ever. It cripples the alliances freedom to move about and Law's ability can't make up for it.
So nothing about your essay really works. A proper topic would be about about Law working for Sword. He wouldn't hurting his friends as a "traitor" and blowing up bridges. He would be gathering information, looking for the real traitor (if X-Drake hasn't figured it out already), and looking for his opponents' weaknesses. Now that's something that can be properly discussed.
Look, you might be laughing at me, but you worded the whole essay very poorly to be honest. You basically want Law to be like X-Drake and join Orochi as a force to undermine him by being part of Sword, right? But the points you made just don't match up. You make it sound like Law is meant to be the bad guy or something. You can't "fake" that when you're hurting people. I mean Law obviously saved his crew because they were no match for Hawkins. He didn't tell the SH because his rescue would risk alerting the beast pirates. Hawkins basically told Law that Orochi is a jerk-face that does whatever he wants with his soldiers, and the bridge/ship thing makes no sense what-so-ever. It cripples the alliances freedom to move about and Law's ability can't make up for it.
So nothing about your essay really works. A proper topic would be about about Law working for Sword. He wouldn't hurting his friends as a "traitor" and blowing up bridges. He would be gathering information, looking for the real traitor (if X-Drake hasn't figured it out already), and looking for his opponents' weaknesses. Now that's something that can be properly discussed.
Last edited: