What I am saying is Zoro is not just Using his haki, he also uses a special sword to help him utilize that haki. And in a SBS Oda told us that this haki is supposed to be his speciality. Yet he Cannot use advanced armament haki or whatever it is without that sword.
Now compare that to Luffy. Luffy learned to use an advanced Form of Armament haki just with instructions. He can do it with or without said sword even so he does NOT specialise in armament haki but King's haki.
Now think about it... Isn't it bizarre that Zoro can suddenly use advanced King's haki in a very special Form for 2 years yet not use "ryuo" Which Oda implies he should have natural Talent for while other people who do in fact specialise in King's haki don't have such forms revealed yet? Like the portrayal is just completely inverted. That is why I am a bit sceptical about ashura being King's haki.
Now compare that to Luffy. Luffy learned to use an advanced Form of Armament haki just with instructions. He can do it with or without said sword even so he does NOT specialise in armament haki but King's haki.
Now think about it... Isn't it bizarre that Zoro can suddenly use advanced King's haki in a very special Form for 2 years yet not use "ryuo" Which Oda implies he should have natural Talent for while other people who do in fact specialise in King's haki don't have such forms revealed yet? Like the portrayal is just completely inverted. That is why I am a bit sceptical about ashura being King's haki.