THANK YOU @Finalbeta, you're such a great guy and I always pour tears after seeing the funny images you post on this forum. You're also a dispenser of the best OP fanarts/crossovers I'd ever find on the web, so I really appreciate all the work and the effort you put to liven up Worstgen
1 > I think your question is rhetorical but I will try to answer it nonetheless. ( Everybody laugh ).
I think the answer is the same that : "does the Hasard / Luck / Randomness exist ( if we don't take Quantic stuff into account )".
Because of Causality, we know that Hasard probably does not exist, but because we human are limited in perception and intelligence, so because we are not Omniscient, Hasard does exist for us because we cannot predict ( or very limited ) what are the consequences of our actions and what the future will bring us.
Same thing for Infinity. Maybe the Universe is finite or will be once his extension stop. Maybe he is circular. But considering our abilities, even if the Universe is not scientifically infinite, I think he will probably always be in our perception.
I still like you. Good night Mista or Miss Night π
Post automatically merged:
2 > Why is there not nothing ? ( Why is there time ? ) I concluded that Times ago by "God exist" and existsnce is as logical as inexistence but clearly I understand if that is not convincing for anyone.
Post automatically merged:
Am I a real Zoro fan ?
Now yes because I'm thankful to you so it's in your honor.
I always liked Zoro but I was not a fan, he was for me a good character but there were so many characters that I liked more that I could not be considered a real fan.
> Not as stylish as Mugen or Afro Samurai
> 3 Swords style seem illogical
Otherwise I already liked him :
> Amazing endurance, resilience, will and sense of honor
> He gets lost all the time like me
> Don't try to seems what he is not
> Able to sacrifice himself
Why is there something rather than nothing is the most compelling question I would suggest, because we can't conceive infinity easily. Our brains look for endless causality relationships and can't ultimately conceive something existing rather than nothing unless being content/not digging enough to pose the problem.
Total energy of the universe is postulated to be = 0 with matter and gravity canceling each other apart
Ok
Quantum Fluctuations can generate a universe from 'nothing'
Ok
Then how did the laws of physics themselves come into existence? Did they always exist? Our brains don't make sense of this.
Eventually we are too limited, eventually the reality we perceive is an illusion of some sort, in fact subjective for our brain configuration anyway; eventually we live in a simulation, or just one of us does even or not even a human, eventually there's another explanation we can't even imagine and so on.
Why is there something rather than nothing is the most compelling question I would suggest, because we can't conceive infinity easily. Our brains look for endless causality relationships and can't ultimately conceive something existing rather than nothing unless being content/not digging enough to pose the problem.
Total energy of the universe is postulated to be = 0 with matter and gravity canceling each other apart
Ok
Quantum Fluctuations can generate a universe from 'nothing'
Ok
Then how did the laws of physics themselves come into existence? Did they always exist? Our brains don't make sense of this.
Eventually we are too limited, eventually the reality we perceive is an illusion of some sort, eventually we live in a simulation, or just one of us does even or not even a human, eventually there's another explanation we can't even imagine and so on.
I'm certainly not as Curious and Scientifically knowledgeable as you are.
> From my limited view, it would be more logical, simple, and lazy ( what I'm doing ) to just say : maybe this Existing thing so complex that it's look like it is random is far more logical than Nothingness because in the end, we do, or at least I do exist and that the fact I can't deny so I must admit that me existing was more logical or more "powerful" that me not Existing. Reasons and Consequences ? I have no clue.
> Compelling question ? I'm far more interested in "When will I finally die" and "Why God let me suffer like this" but each their own thing. I have a real passion for drawing so I will never dismiss anyone interest as "illogical".
> The Dimensions and Law of physic ? If we are evolutionnary creature, then Evolution ( or God ) just did not think I would need to simply see the "11 dimensions" like I did not need to breath under water, fly or be able to emit a Vanilla perfume.
We can't perceive all of them like we could not see atoms or what is in the Oven of my neighbor but nothing stop me from admitting they exist. Like you said right ?
So this is complex but just like the rest. Complex ( and maybe sometime in the future more identifiable ).
I'm certainly not as Curious and Scientifically knowledgeable as you are.
> From my limited view, it would be more logical, simple, and lazy ( what I'm doing ) to just say : maybe this Existing thing so complex that it's look like it is random is far more logical than Nothingness because in the end, we do, or at least I do exist and that the fact I can't deny so I must admit that me existing was more logical or more "powerful" that me not Existing. Reasons and Consequences ? I have no clue.
> Compelling question ? I'm far more interested in "When will I finally die" and "Why God let me suffer like this" but each their own thing. I have a real passion for drawing so I will never dismiss anyone interest as "illogical".
> The Dimensions and Law of physic ? If we are evolutionnary creature, then Evolution ( or God ) just did not think I would need to simply see the "11 dimensions" like I did not need to breath under water, fly or be able to emit a Vanilla perfume.
We can't perceive all of them like we could not see atoms or what is in the Oven of my neighbor but nothing stop me from admitting they exist. Like you said right ?
So this is complex but just like the rest. Complex ( and maybe sometime in the future more identifiable ).
I'm certainly not as Curious and Scientifically knowledgeable as you are.
> From my limited view, it would be more logical, simple, and lazy ( what I'm doing ) to just say : maybe this Existing thing so complex that it's look like it is random is far more logical than Nothingness because in the end, we do, or at least I do exist and that the fact I can't deny so I must admit that me existing was more logical or more "powerful" that me not Existing. Reasons and Consequences ? I have no clue.
> Compelling question ? I'm far more interested in "When will I finally die" and "Why God let me suffer like this" but each their own thing. I have a real passion for drawing so I will never dismiss anyone interest as "illogical".
> The Dimensions and Law of physic ? If we are evolutionnary creature, then Evolution ( or God ) just did not think I would need to simply see the "11 dimensions" like I did not need to breath under water, fly or be able to emit a Vanilla perfume.
We can't perceive all of them like we could not see atoms or what is in the Oven of my neighbor but nothing stop me from admitting they exist. Like you said right ?
So this is complex but just like the rest. Complex ( and maybe sometime in the future more identifiable ).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.