Existence and Inexistence : Why despite seeming more logical, Inexistence is maybe not the most logical
> What I know : Science Fact > My perception
What are Science Facts ? Things we are estimating as true because following our Logical Abilities. Best example are Logic and Mathematics which applied to our environment allow us to understand physics.
> What I know 2 : I exist because I think and perceive
> What I know 3 : I perceive my environment, my environment probably obey physics and such Causality ( a -> b1 and b2, b1 -> c1 and c2 and c3,.... ) So my environment must be logical and its causation must be logical. So existsnce must be logical. Even if Matters ( Matters is movements, vobrations right ? ) seems to be something, and something seems to be more illogical than nothing. Because nothing means no Causality, no Movements, Reality show me things, so those things are logical because if they were not logical, they would not exist, I would not exist.
Post automatically merged:
In 2 simple sentences : Existence is more logical than Inexistence because Existence has won. Proof is that I perceive something, something = part of Existence, so Existence exist.
@Finalbeta is like that one guy who determines the natural science of life. The man who divides the path between mankind and omnipotence. The man who reached enlightenment. Goated man.:cheers:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.