[FNZ] Role Madness [Season 2] Round 10 - Antagonists Vs Protagonists
- Status
Flower, I've already explained why your counterwagon was worth jack shit and how I don't really think you were in danger of being lynched. Besides, Light, Nat, and Ryu were the ones that pushed for your lynch and voted for you. If you think you were a counterwagon, then one of those three need to be wolf naturally, yet you aren't even looking in that direction.
There's no discredit, YOU haven't done anything. Just because you're trying to sway the narrative and I disagree doesn't mean I'm discrediting you. As soon as I told you that you shouldn't claim or get to choose, you instantly went OMGUS and said I shouldn't have a voice either on the decision. When I asked you why you believed that, you didn't answer me. So you there you were trying to discredit the weight of my voice. Then when I called you scum, you said I'm ALWAYS wrong about you, despite that history of being wrong about you only accounting to one game. There you discredit me. You ignoring the fact that we could have had two wolves in D1 as wagons doesn't man that when I bring that idea up, that I'm discrediting you.
Nah, your play with the Lie Detect has been shit if true, so I'm not going to give you the benefit of the doubt here. WE ALREADY KNEW YOU WERE LIE DETECT BY YOUR HINTING. The fact you claimed is absolute garbage and burned one of our claims, something you said was scum-indicative for Cal, but apparently it isn't for you because you ACTED EMOTIONALLY SO THAT'S AN EXCUSE. You said 'Cal burned claims so I can too, boohoo'.
TAC says he already said he was Town multiple times. The fact you continue to push him for not giving you the perfect response isn't a good look.
There's no discredit, YOU haven't done anything. Just because you're trying to sway the narrative and I disagree doesn't mean I'm discrediting you. As soon as I told you that you shouldn't claim or get to choose, you instantly went OMGUS and said I shouldn't have a voice either on the decision. When I asked you why you believed that, you didn't answer me. So you there you were trying to discredit the weight of my voice. Then when I called you scum, you said I'm ALWAYS wrong about you, despite that history of being wrong about you only accounting to one game. There you discredit me. You ignoring the fact that we could have had two wolves in D1 as wagons doesn't man that when I bring that idea up, that I'm discrediting you.
Nah, your play with the Lie Detect has been shit if true, so I'm not going to give you the benefit of the doubt here. WE ALREADY KNEW YOU WERE LIE DETECT BY YOUR HINTING. The fact you claimed is absolute garbage and burned one of our claims, something you said was scum-indicative for Cal, but apparently it isn't for you because you ACTED EMOTIONALLY SO THAT'S AN EXCUSE. You said 'Cal burned claims so I can too, boohoo'.
TAC says he already said he was Town multiple times. The fact you continue to push him for not giving you the perfect response isn't a good look.
Continue open wolfing, that's fine. Let me explain how this is angle-shooting to a player that's supposedly quite experienced. We have no idea what Cal's characters are and personally, I don't even know what fucking characters are going to be in this game. From what Cal has said about his ability, he's probably a Tracker. So I'm not really sure how you decided that Cal could be Aizen, but the fact that Aizen is an antagonist, and there is absolutely nothing tying Aizen to Cal, this is you softly shading Cal once again as wolf.
Don't worry Flower, you'll learn to play Mafia the right way one day.
Don't worry Flower, you'll learn to play Mafia the right way one day.
Thatโs because sheโs so anti-town itโs her town meta 
- Status