Ratchet, I don't care about the rest, but are you looking at the stupid arguments that Flower is making?
First Flower says this:
Of course I know that the Doc can't protect me from being ignited, which wasn't even my argument here. I'm saying I can't be protected by from an ignition if I am revealed since I can't be healed at all. Flower openly misinterpreted my post here.
We don't, and even I don't. Either we believe Flower and I know that the arso is present since I can't investigate with the Arso results anyway, or Flower is the one that doused me.
Or Flower also has an unverifiable claim and is making me reveal myself because as the Arso she can ignite me anytime now since I can never be healed of being doused.
We have no proof of a retri being here, just because it's unique doesn't mean that it is present.
It's always a defense I can use and in ToS I want to save my mayor reveal when we need it like in Lylo. The entire point of a consensual innocent child, like the mayor, was built for those predicaments. Come on, you, ratchet and I have played mafia and know it all too well much better. Don't tell me you're actually listening to the BS that flower is spouting.
Nope, trust me. It's either I am doused, or Flower is the arso wanting to get a definite ignition with my reveal. Trust me here Krogo.