Should MonsterZoro be banned?


  • Total voters
    300
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Didnt we go through the mental gymnastics of this back during roof piece

Zoro was bare chested with a bandana against Hyouzo

Zoro wqa bare chested against Hawkins but no bandana, no armament and only two swords even

Zoro wasnt bare chested or have a bandana but had Armament in his last move against Killer

Zoro wasnt bare chested or have a bandana but he was using armament for regular attackd against Apoo, not even finishers like with Killer, just regular clashes

Zoro wasnt bare chested but had armament and bandana against the yonko.

So using all the sample info above, how exqctly do you rate how serious Zoro is now? Hyouzo level seriousness? Killer level? Hawkins level? Apoo level? Yonko level?

Hehehe, it kinda looks arbitrary to just list fashion items and such as “This means Zoro is serious”

We know peak Zoro, its Ashura and Advanved CoC… thats it… everything else, clothes or no clothes is regular Zoro. He is the same strength at all times.
You guys are the ones who say if Zoro fights an 'YC' he would one-shot. King and Queen aren't one-shot, which means he is on YC lvl, not Yonko lvl. Getting help in team fight doesn't put you on level on Yonko or stronger. That more mental gymnastics on your side there.
Post automatically merged:

But according to this forum because Zoro could cut Kaido he should one shot King
They won't admit that. There too biased on that :kayneshrug:.
 
Zoro will return to kill Kaido. King is designed to help Zoro grow.

Everything I said would happen is happening. I just had it in the wrong order.
Nah, Luffy is the one to beat Kaido. Don't headcannon especially Zoro trust Luffy and talks about this fight being tough with him on the YCs. No more Head Piece, that is headcannon there.
 
No sold is a big word and regardless he tackled a nerfed Zoro.

Also how many Thunder Bagua could the Grandmaster no sell by channelling his alleged barrier defence exactly? He tackled the entire Hakai thing and ended up damaged but far from death.
2 enough to kill him without Law support.
 
Big Mom said, even if Luffy manages to get past Cracker, he won't reach the castle in time, further asking if Luffy is just big talk or if he can put actions behind his words too. Doesn't quite sound like "now that Cracker is there, Luffy has no hope anymore". Cracker was just used to buy time, nothing more.

BM was confident he beats Luffy despite hearing that he beat Doflamingo. She was proven correct when he would have beaten him except for Nami interfering. And no your headcanon about him somehow getting a win without Nami is not relevant. There is no evidence for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top