Status
Not open for further replies.

Lindltaylor

There's no "Tina!"
Before I commit to Zara's lynch, how come we are saying that Zara not getting a clean result on Tobi is lynch worthy but Conquist's incorrect result on Cal is not treated equally? I don't want to lynch Conquist this phase but aren't the two cases kind of similar?

Meanwhile we still have Dyna out here stealing abilities and role crushing Town. I still think that's a viable option right now.
Nah, Zara's case is far far more scummier than Conquist's.

It's not just him not getting a clean result, it's his playstyle overall, his vote hopping on day 1 to save himself was scummy first of all. His vest up on N1 was again scummy, which btw, I don't think he vested up N1. He probably visited Dyna. Now, his ability claim is apparently not as legit as it should be since both Krogo and Dyna say that the ability description doesn't fit the ability name.

So it's not just Zara not getting a clean result on Tobi, it's Zara's ability claim itself being doubtful here.

agreed. but is there a possibility that the manipulative ability which messed up my invest involved swapping the investigator's target?

like say a wants to invest b. c (the manipulator) uses his ability on b and swaps b with d. so a ends up investigating d while thinking it was b.

can an ability like that be in play? im just asking though, i completely agree with the zara lynch.
Thing is if Zara is A who wants to investigate B and if B is swapped with D. Then all of B's visitors go to D. That means Zara, Prof and Rej should all go to D.

But Rej still didn't see Zara visiting whoever Tobi was swapped with, but saw Prof.
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
Thing is if Zara is A who wants to investigate B and if B is swapped with D. Then all of B's visitors go to D. That means Zara, Prof and Rej should all go to D.

But Rej still didn't see Zara visiting whoever Tobi was swapped with, but saw Prof.
yeah got it. since prof visited tobi, so either zara's lying or tobi, rej & prof are lying with a perfectly concocted story which is probably not the case.
 
Nah, Zara's case is far far more scummier than Conquist's.

It's not just him not getting a clean result, it's his playstyle overall, his vote hopping on day 1 to save himself was scummy first of all. His vest up on N1 was again scummy, which btw, I don't think he vested up N1. He probably visited Dyna. Now, his ability claim is apparently not as legit as it should be since both Krogo and Dyna say that the ability description doesn't fit the ability name.

So it's not just Zara not getting a clean result on Tobi, it's Zara's ability claim itself being doubtful here.


Thing is if Zara is A who wants to investigate B and if B is swapped with D. Then all of B's visitors go to D. That means Zara, Prof and Rej should all go to D.

But Rej still didn't see Zara visiting whoever Tobi was swapped with, but saw Prof.
All of these claims hurt my head. I honestly think Dyna ha been way scummier this game, but Rej feels pretty that Zara wasn't messed with for his invest.

Vote Lynch Zara

I would like it to be known that I still think Dyna is a scummier option.
 
Yeaaaah by what Tobi said he already has a stand. But he is the group of characters "protecting" Kira in the story.

So my memory is that Arrow was used only once?
It was dropped and picked up twice I believe dunno if it was used once or twice.

But when it came to Kira's father arrowing people, only 1 actually stuck with Kira, the others were just doing what they were told and caved after being beaten to be either neutral and leave the allies alone or becoming an ally.

Freaking Part 4.
 
It was dropped and picked up twice I believe dunno if it was used once or twice.

But when it came to Kira's father arrowing people, only 1 actually stuck with Kira, the others were just doing what they were told and caved after being beaten to be either neutral and leave the allies alone or becoming an ally.

Freaking Part 4.
Well... fair point... but what the hell is arrow for then? Giving people requiem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top