It isn't about that, i guess it's just the spirit of the fighter. If you consider yourself a swordsman then you are one, but if you don't, then you aren't. King uses one but isn't a swordsman.
King will show some incredible speed feats when he enters his hybrid mode, we have seen full extent of Kata and his entire arsenal yet somehow it feels base King is turning out to be even more impressive
idk if you said or not
I know vast majority of YOUR FANDOM said it
and somehow you are using THIS to attack us?
Hakiman argument was about CoC
and you just called it stupid ...
so I bet my ass you called it fodder control in past don't lie
I didn't. I thought hakiman was something people said regarding Shanks? That he's not a swordsman, and his main fighting style is haki, so he's hakiman... Or something.
Anyhow, I was just making a point that haki doesn't create a whole new combat type. Idk about y'all history of bickerings lol.
This is a material for a good discussion. What being a swordsman and what being not just a swordsman means, both topics are going through revision for many readers.
This whole Swordman, Hakiman reminds me of the whole "Quincy only uses Bow" bullshit from Ishida only for the Final Arc the Quincy uses literallly every fucking weapons ever exist, even bombs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.