[FNZ] Salem of Lies Round 3 : Town Of Salem
- Thread starter Xlaw
- Start date
- Status
@Don DaSlayer answer honestly did you visit someone last night??
He said he'd be okay being lynched if Don flipped Town?
I do agree that Ekko has caused a lot of chaos so far in this game. I think I've been following him decently enough, but as someone who's never really played TOS, I'm still not sure if I get all the terms and abilities being mentioned. The thing is, I am so used to Town Ekko being an anarchic character and I just feel he's a lot more composed and calculated as scum.
I do agree that Ekko has caused a lot of chaos so far in this game. I think I've been following him decently enough, but as someone who's never really played TOS, I'm still not sure if I get all the terms and abilities being mentioned. The thing is, I am so used to Town Ekko being an anarchic character and I just feel he's a lot more composed and calculated as scum.
I hate playing on my phone. Literally can’t quote anyone on different pages without it being annoying.
I mean at this point, Ekk should just actually explain his results. Because saying don is ac and voting and pushing him to be jailed but then saying oh well you can be town maybe is like what.
in TOS if you actually have info use it please. Don’t play games like this it makes you look really bad and doesn’t help town in the slightest.
Not a big fan of the quick vote pick up by a few to follow Ekk especially with how crappy he actually started that whole conversation. Remember this is majority lynch so if we stack too many votes we go right to the voting and that wastes time. So be careful on votes unless you are hella certain with your choice.
dest idk what you meant with why? Didn’t understand what you were questioning if you could ask again fully.
Al you always all over the place hope you got your bait you were throwing out for reactions. Not very good imo and a possible backtrack to keep an eye on.
I mean at this point, Ekk should just actually explain his results. Because saying don is ac and voting and pushing him to be jailed but then saying oh well you can be town maybe is like what.
in TOS if you actually have info use it please. Don’t play games like this it makes you look really bad and doesn’t help town in the slightest.
Not a big fan of the quick vote pick up by a few to follow Ekk especially with how crappy he actually started that whole conversation. Remember this is majority lynch so if we stack too many votes we go right to the voting and that wastes time. So be careful on votes unless you are hella certain with your choice.
dest idk what you meant with why? Didn’t understand what you were questioning if you could ask again fully.
Al you always all over the place hope you got your bait you were throwing out for reactions. Not very good imo and a possible backtrack to keep an eye on.
I'm not going to question why Usopp does things. Some things are best left unknown.
He said he was 10/10 sure Don was scum if AL wasn't targeted by anyone else, or something like that. He also repeatedly insisted Don was scum. That's a 1:1 trade in my book. If he backtracks from that then I don't see why I should tolerate it.
He said he was 10/10 sure Don was scum if AL wasn't targeted by anyone else, or something like that. He also repeatedly insisted Don was scum. That's a 1:1 trade in my book. If he backtracks from that then I don't see why I should tolerate it.
Honestly main reason would be there are a few roles town has that doesn’t use abilities that are active toward people.
also Ekk was all over the place who would claim any info for scum when Ekk literally has no backing in the slightest just fishing. Especially in a type of mafia where jest and exe are much more prominent to cause the chaos
also Ekk was all over the place who would claim any info for scum when Ekk literally has no backing in the slightest just fishing. Especially in a type of mafia where jest and exe are much more prominent to cause the chaos
In fairness, I had a whole interaction with him on another site where he stated claims were bad and anti-town, eventually claimed, was duly killed and then at the end of the game blamed the Town's loss, in a set up that was to be kind "scum-sided" on the act of enforcing claims for scummy behaviour. He simply has different philosophies though my issue comes from the unwillingness to adapt that philosophy when presented with alternative viewpoints. Which is a long way of saying, I'm not surprised in the slightest to see him play this so awkwardly.
- Status