Are you attractive to woman with full tattoos all over they body?

W

Wonderful World

#21
Honestly, if a girl doesn't have a full face tattoo (minimum 30mm across, centered) + neck tattoo (minimum 40mm-60mm maximum) + arm tattoo (at least two per arm; at least 30mm, no maximum) + leg tattoos (3 per leg; minimum 60mm-90mm maximum) + back tattoo (either one large tattoo: 120mm-200mm or six individual tattoos with minimum 40mm-75mm maximum centered in 2 by 3 columns) + at least 3 different colors per tattoo + at least one of those tattoos comprising a 'smiley face' + one tattoo involving the date of birth (MM/DD/YYYY) + at least one tattoo being a triangular sphere + no tattoos comprising of the letters 't,' 'f,' or 'x' + no tattoos involving the angle 301 degrees, 205 degrees or 68.9 degrees in standard position + at least one tattoo involving the digits 6, 7 or 9 (no tattoo may feature a combination of 6 and 7, or 7 and 9) + no tattoos featuring the objects 'trash can,' 'window frame,' or '361 degree protractor' in either blue, black or orange dye, but cannot be in teal, purple or red dye, then I am uninterested.
:gokulaugh::myman:
 
#22
Honestly, if a girl doesn't have a full face tattoo (minimum 30mm across, centered) + neck tattoo (minimum 40mm-60mm maximum) + arm tattoo (at least two per arm; at least 30mm, no maximum) + leg tattoos (3 per leg; minimum 60mm-90mm maximum) + back tattoo (either one large tattoo: 120mm-200mm or six individual tattoos with minimum 40mm-75mm maximum centered in 2 by 3 columns) + at least 3 different colors per tattoo + at least one of those tattoos comprising a 'smiley face' + one tattoo involving the date of birth (MM/DD/YYYY) + at least one tattoo being a triangular sphere + no tattoos comprising of the letters 't,' 'f,' or 'x' + no tattoos involving the angle 301 degrees, 205 degrees or 68.9 degrees in standard position + at least one tattoo involving the digits 6, 7 or 9 (no tattoo may feature a combination of 6 and 7, or 7 and 9) + no tattoos featuring the objects 'trash can,' 'window frame,' or '361 degree protractor' in either blue, black or orange dye, but cannot be in teal, purple or red dye, then I am uninterested.
:nicagesmile:
 
#23
Honestly, if a girl doesn't have a full face tattoo (minimum 30mm across, centered) + neck tattoo (minimum 40mm-60mm maximum) + arm tattoo (at least two per arm; at least 30mm, no maximum) + leg tattoos (3 per leg; minimum 60mm-90mm maximum) + back tattoo (either one large tattoo: 120mm-200mm or six individual tattoos with minimum 40mm-75mm maximum centered in 2 by 3 columns) + at least 3 different colors per tattoo + at least one of those tattoos comprising a 'smiley face' + one tattoo involving the date of birth (MM/DD/YYYY) + at least one tattoo being a triangular sphere + no tattoos comprising of the letters 't,' 'f,' or 'x' + no tattoos involving the angle 301 degrees, 205 degrees or 68.9 degrees in standard position + at least one tattoo involving the digits 6, 7 or 9 (no tattoo may feature a combination of 6 and 7, or 7 and 9) + no tattoos featuring the objects 'trash can,' 'window frame,' or '361 degree protractor' in either blue, black or orange dye, but cannot be in teal, purple or red dye, then I am uninterested.
you fitting the whole friggin matrix on her mate...
Post automatically merged:

You know just a personal kink thing..


i rather embellish her with jewels..


weed would work if im broke
 
#32
It does men was the original that started it and some woman follow along lol
men were the first one to wear heels as well.. tho I'm against tatoos since its taboo here for religious reasons coz it promotes people to accept who they are than permanently embellish their appearances with alterations... i think that's brilliant actually.

so Jewels >>
 
#34
Legs, arms, neck, chest everything tatted up no clear skin left it just feel weird to me they resemble dudes more than being a woman lol:gonope:
It depends what you mean by "attractive," if you mean "sexually" for pure lust then maybe, if you mean romantic love and not just sexual lust then "for me personally" no.
Post automatically merged:

but tattoos don't make women look like men. That doesn't even make any sense.
Yeah, that part doesn't make any sense at all. The thing that makes women look like men is musical.
 
Last edited:
#38
"Pure lust" lol but yea I'm mean both
Then no. I view female bodies as one of the most BEAUTIFUL things that nature has ever created, I like to watch their beautiful arms, legs, "angel like" facial features in their most purest form. It's very hard–again for me personally–to enjoy that beauty when it's covered in paint, especially sometimes with weird shit.
 
Last edited:
Top