D
What's this logic? That's basically what you did. What's this hypocrisy?
@Dr_Professor83 I'll respond to your case in a moment.
@Dr_Professor83 I'll respond to your case in a moment.
[FNZ] Role Madness Kaguya-sama: Love is Mafia!
- Thread starter Rej
- Start date
- Tags #larimo afksenpai anarchy certified rej game love is mafia mafia is love love is stronger than mafia the will of n
- Status
D
Hard carrying the Ekko lynch, lmfao. What is this outright lie? I'm not even gonna entertain this. @Dr_Professor83 do an iso on T-Pein and tell me if he's telling the truth here. I guarantee you he's not.
D
You never have.
I'd defend anyone who I think is being suspected for unjust reasoning. I'd even defend players I suspect. This defense is not AI. It's something I always do. And me doing it doesn't mean I town read the person cause again, I'd defend my suspects if I think the reasoning other players using against them is illogical.
I'd defend anyone who I think is being suspected for unjust reasoning. I'd even defend players I suspect. This defense is not AI. It's something I always do. And me doing it doesn't mean I town read the person cause again, I'd defend my suspects if I think the reasoning other players using against them is illogical.
D
This is the type of logic that people use to suspect specific players, saying "X is still alive must mean he's scum since scum should have killed him by now. They're too much of a threat to be left alive," and almost always, that person was town and scum simply didn't want to kill them. That logic is silly. Sure, X person should be dead but you can't predict what mafia is gonna do. It's illogical to suspect a guy for simply being alive for too long.
Because we were talking about Ultra. That was one of the cores of Ekko and mine's argument D1.
I was not. I thought she was being shady for being a low-poster. Juliet's general scum meta is more or less just barely meeting the post count each day. So early on, when I was seeing that she wasn't posting much, I had it in the back of my mind. However, that's not sufficient enough for me to place a vote on her immediately. An FoS is not the same as flat-out scum read. I still needed to be sold on her case, which is why later on, as you pointed out, I agreed with what Kagura had said after I did my iso on Juliet.
Why do you find that weird? About bringing up JW, that was a necessary question, cause I was wondering why Ekko was singling me out for not voting Ultra when I wasn't the only one who refused to do so.
I need more than "coulds," Prof. I don't see anything that I said in there that wouldn't come from a townie.
Of course. "Classic scum in peril tactic," "I've even done it before," with that knowledge in mind, why wouldn't I be certain when I see someone else doing it?
My first post said "if". I hadn't made my decision yet. My second post you can clearly see that I'm pondering over it. And in my third post, I've made my decision. I don't see the issue.
I don't understand what you mean here.
Because we were talking about Ultra. That was one of the cores of Ekko and mine's argument D1.
I was not. I thought she was being shady for being a low-poster. Juliet's general scum meta is more or less just barely meeting the post count each day. So early on, when I was seeing that she wasn't posting much, I had it in the back of my mind. However, that's not sufficient enough for me to place a vote on her immediately. An FoS is not the same as flat-out scum read. I still needed to be sold on her case, which is why later on, as you pointed out, I agreed with what Kagura had said after I did my iso on Juliet.
Why do you find that weird? About bringing up JW, that was a necessary question, cause I was wondering why Ekko was singling me out for not voting Ultra when I wasn't the only one who refused to do so.
I need more than "coulds," Prof. I don't see anything that I said in there that wouldn't come from a townie.
Of course. "Classic scum in peril tactic," "I've even done it before," with that knowledge in mind, why wouldn't I be certain when I see someone else doing it?
My first post said "if". I hadn't made my decision yet. My second post you can clearly see that I'm pondering over it. And in my third post, I've made my decision. I don't see the issue.
I don't understand what you mean here.
It’s not that your argument is bad or even wrong, it’s going back at it and looking at it in hindsight and seeing if it’s a move that makes sense for you to do as scum. And it does. I disagree that it’s completely wrong to do a double take when someone is being kept around to long with a role like that. It’s at least worth thinking about. But you shut it down right away in a way that looks preemptive.
I actually don’t see where y’all were talking about Ultra at that point. Though it gets difficult in a few places to see if Ekko is talking about Ultra or Ryu a few times. I don’t see him talking about Ultra directly before that.
Fair enough there.
Because after a certain point it seems like you’d just tell Ekko to kick rocks on that subject instead of going in circles with him on if forever and focus your attention elsewhere. The way you needed to defend not voting Ultra every time makes it feel like something you know needed defending. It’s just a ton of back and forth over not voting someone you don’t scum read instead of moving on.
Eh, that’s fair, I’ve asked people the same thing when questioning me about something someone else is also doing as Town to figure them out.
Coulds are pretty much all we have to go on here so that’s the best you’re going to get. I don’t talk in absolutes unless I am very certain. Almost everything in mafia is a “could” or a “may” until we get a flip.
And yes, I can see where a lot of the things you say can come from a townie, but that doesn’t mean it was from a townie. I can’t ignore the way it would also be a good move for scum to make there.
So you were certain Juliet was scum at that point but you peeled off so easily? You didn’t spend much time grilling that claim which I’d expect you to do if you were certain Juliet was scum.
It just seems like you may have felt the need to overly justify Juliet not being the lynch there over Mango and Ekko who were apparently stronger scum reads.
I actually don’t see where y’all were talking about Ultra at that point. Though it gets difficult in a few places to see if Ekko is talking about Ultra or Ryu a few times. I don’t see him talking about Ultra directly before that.
Fair enough there.
Because after a certain point it seems like you’d just tell Ekko to kick rocks on that subject instead of going in circles with him on if forever and focus your attention elsewhere. The way you needed to defend not voting Ultra every time makes it feel like something you know needed defending. It’s just a ton of back and forth over not voting someone you don’t scum read instead of moving on.
Eh, that’s fair, I’ve asked people the same thing when questioning me about something someone else is also doing as Town to figure them out.
Coulds are pretty much all we have to go on here so that’s the best you’re going to get. I don’t talk in absolutes unless I am very certain. Almost everything in mafia is a “could” or a “may” until we get a flip.
And yes, I can see where a lot of the things you say can come from a townie, but that doesn’t mean it was from a townie. I can’t ignore the way it would also be a good move for scum to make there.
So you were certain Juliet was scum at that point but you peeled off so easily? You didn’t spend much time grilling that claim which I’d expect you to do if you were certain Juliet was scum.
It just seems like you may have felt the need to overly justify Juliet not being the lynch there over Mango and Ekko who were apparently stronger scum reads.
- Status