I am not sure I follow here. If by facilitating between players you mean going after more players then yeah of course I did that, I've had multiple people I've suspected. I am also not sure what you mean by bland questioning, I always question people that way.
I also disagree here. I've asked multiple people to explain themselves, claim when needed, and share their thoughts. I am trying to figure out stuff. And I disagree on the conviction part. How does that make sense when without me tagging the players and getting them to vote, which you can see in my ISO, we most likely wouldn't have even had a lynch at all?
I am not sure how to answer this lol.
This speaks to the first point about questioning and lack of convictions behind your pushes. The thought process is in the development of reads, and engaging peeps with questioning to figure them out, not just faking contribution. Lack of convictions speaks to "no skin in the game" thingy 'cause like there is an emotional aspect of when you got a read and want someone dead lol.
This is also not true at all lol. Cinera was the leading wagon, when I switched my vote on Al, whom I've suspected
We were stuck on a wagon that wasn't going anywhere, the phase was kinda dead, and people didn't care. I switched to AL, pushed it, got the lynch, and we got rid of a scum. I did advance the game, and advanced to a lynch of a person I suspected, and got it right.
Which part are you referring to in the latter post?
That's basically my stlye of questioning people. I like to get them talking on the subjects that interest me, and I dislike parroting.
That's basically my stlye of questioning people. I like to get them talking on the subjects that interest me, and I dislike parroting.
As for your style of questioning, never played with you so that's good to now.
Thanks Zemmi & Flower