General & Others Naruto series should not have been named Naruto

#2
Am I the only one that feels the series should not have been after naruto with the amount of screen time an importance the author gave to other characters like sasuke
Always thought that calling the series like the mc was dumb. Imagine instead of Hunter x Hunter we got "Gon". Instead of One Piece we have "Luffy" and instead of Dragon Ball we get "Goku". Like fr, show some originality.
 
#6
Always thought that calling the series like the mc was dumb. Imagine instead of Hunter x Hunter we got "Gon". Instead of One Piece we have "Luffy" and instead of Dragon Ball we get "Goku". Like fr, show some originality.
Yeah, but we also have "Dexter" & "Hannibal". Show named after M.c can work,the problem is that Naruto isn't an interesting or unique enough character to shoulder that weight, people didn't tune in just for Naruto.

Edit: some grammar
 
#8
Yeah, but we also have "Dexter" & "Hannibal". Show named after M.c can work,the problem is that Naruto isn't an interesting or unique enough character to shoulder that weight, people didn't tune in just for Naruto.

Edit: some grammar
That's a very good point. The character that is named after the show should be able to carry this weight easily. And Naruto fails to do so.
 
#15
Spiderman
Batman
Superman
Loki
Thor
Ironman
Venom
Hulk

Huh, oh, wrong thread. Sorry.
Post automatically merged:

Yeah, but we also have "Dexter" & "Hannibal". Show named after M.c can work,the problem is that Naruto isn't an interesting or unique enough character to shoulder that weight, people didn't tune in just for Naruto.

Edit: some grammar
He is intetesting to me.
The story revolves around Naruto.
Naruto upbringing
Naruto's past, present, future.
Naruto's training.
Naruto's 9 tail.

Is there any arc where Naruto was not a key player?
 
Top