[FNZ] Role Madness Toonami Mafia I: Fullmetal Alchemist
- Thread starter Ariess
- Start date
- Tags always lynch flower dante x tac fujisfooked homo infinite flower works panda supremacy rip af rip ratchet
- Status
"@Flowa So here is my issue. You asked me a pointless question - one that doesn't inform you either way as to my alignment. When I didn't answer that, you stopped displaying any thought process behind figuring out my slot. You instead looked to spin it in a way that could conceivably result in me being Scum - without regard for how likely this was. Your determination that I was openly scumming was nonsense. Most importantly, this only occurred both after I voted you, and after the thread began to lean towards your narrative.
The takeaway is that you had no interest in my alignment. Me answering your question mattered naught. No action was triggered from it. I don't believe for an instant you saw me refusing to say, and then thought it must be because I'm scum scared of lie detects.
This leads to only one conclusion - your play here was geared into reading me as Scum, it was not a natural development that you followed. There was no townie thought process wherein you are actually interesting in figuring out my alignment. You were only interested in finding a reason to lynch me.
If you are town, it means you came into this game intending to handle my slot in bad faith. Whether it be due to spite, paranoia, or simply wanting me eliminated early, you have come in with loaded assumptions and no interest in figuring out what I am. If you're scum, you saw the opportunity to mislynch a player and jumped on it.
You then trying to push blame onto me is the final nail in the coffin. Once again, there is no interest in figuring out what it is I'm saying - I bet you haven't even come up with a shortlist of characters I could plausibly be from what I have hinted at. You've mistaken my gimmick posting for me being switched off. I expect an adequate defence to this, otherwise my vote will be remaining on you. By adequate defence, I am of course referring to a thought process or evidence against you being scum, or for you being Town."
.
"@Flowa So here is my issue. You asked me a pointless question - one that doesn't inform you either way as to my alignment. When I didn't answer that, you stopped displaying any thought process behind figuring out my slot. You instead looked to spin it in a way that could conceivably result in me being Scum - without regard for how likely this was. Your determination that I was openly scumming was nonsense. Most importantly, this only occurred both after I voted you, and after the thread began to lean towards your narrative.
The takeaway is that you had no interest in my alignment. Me answering your question mattered naught. No action was triggered from it. I don't believe for an instant you saw me refusing to say, and then thought it must be because I'm scum scared of lie detects.
This leads to only one conclusion - your play here was geared into reading me as Scum, it was not a natural development that you followed. There was no townie thought process wherein you are actually interesting in figuring out my alignment. You were only interested in finding a reason to lynch me.
If you are town, it means you came into this game intending to handle my slot in bad faith. Whether it be due to spite, paranoia, or simply wanting me eliminated early, you have come in with loaded assumptions and no interest in figuring out what I am. If you're scum, you saw the opportunity to mislynch a player and jumped on it.
You then trying to push blame onto me is the final nail in the coffin. Once again, there is no interest in figuring out what it is I'm saying - I bet you haven't even come up with a shortlist of characters I could plausibly be from what I have hinted at. You've mistaken my gimmick posting for me being switched off. I expect an adequate defence to this, otherwise my vote will be remaining on you. By adequate defence, I am of course referring to a thought process or evidence against you being scum, or for you being Town."
J
Okay, I´m surprised so many here suggest not to go for Ekko today.
@Ekkologix The thing is we are 30 players in this round and so the chances to eliminate an immediate threat aren´t that high for us.
Which players did you suggest for lynch so far?
Won´t go for Ratchet to be honest because he is acting up TOO much in my opinion.
Gave my best to read through all the pages, obvious Rottkins, Prof and Blue seem sus to me.
While I get town vibes from Lord Melkor, Rej, Nibel and Worst.
No clue regarding the rest of the players.
@Ekkologix The thing is we are 30 players in this round and so the chances to eliminate an immediate threat aren´t that high for us.
Which players did you suggest for lynch so far?
Won´t go for Ratchet to be honest because he is acting up TOO much in my opinion.
Gave my best to read through all the pages, obvious Rottkins, Prof and Blue seem sus to me.
While I get town vibes from Lord Melkor, Rej, Nibel and Worst.
No clue regarding the rest of the players.
The Truth has appeared to give out the last philosopher stone for day 0. After this all philosopher stones will only appear once 2 players are eliminated from the game.
To obtain this you must first answer this trivia question. First to pm me the answer will obtain it...
What is one is all and all is one?
it will be glorious 
- Status