[FNZ] Role Madness Valentine's and White's Day Special Mafia Game: Date a Live
- Thread starter Mashiro Blue
- Start date
- Tags al is an adult man blasphemy breedable bring beta back bye kurumi chwaaaan date a live season 4 rocks dont listen to ekko ekko is scum af ekko the game thread clogger finalbeta is god of mafia lynch flowa natsumi best girl origami is a dawg rej is town sandwich with the twins she's dead two days long dayphases are cancer watch ya boy kongming guys where are you kurumi chwaaaaan who is biggest spammer -- ekko or fuji or beta?
- Status
J
I completely missed that maf chat stuff out and would have to read Nana´s posts about this, otherwise I can´t say anything about Mitch as he didn´t give us much to work with so far.
Mitch or BornInAbyss could be maf, would be really lame but I can´t rule this out.
From the one sentence I read I noticed a spelling error, whoever wrote it wrote "czn" instead of "can", we could look for the grammar or for specific words and then compare the writing style to a user it could fit to? Ask ourselves, who would write a sentence like this? Who would ask the host or his maf colleagues a question like this? Would be my suggestion.
Mitch or BornInAbyss could be maf, would be really lame but I can´t rule this out.
From the one sentence I read I noticed a spelling error, whoever wrote it wrote "czn" instead of "can", we could look for the grammar or for specific words and then compare the writing style to a user it could fit to? Ask ourselves, who would write a sentence like this? Who would ask the host or his maf colleagues a question like this? Would be my suggestion.
J
Nana´s last post was this one by the way.
This question was directed to Worst who indeed jumped the Yo wagon really easy.
Also I remember Worst saying that he has a reviving ability too, but how likely is it that there are two townies with reviving abilities? The more I think about it, the more I get the feeling that I should add Worst to my scum list.
This question was directed to Worst who indeed jumped the Yo wagon really easy.
Also I remember Worst saying that he has a reviving ability too, but how likely is it that there are two townies with reviving abilities? The more I think about it, the more I get the feeling that I should add Worst to my scum list.
D
That's a spelling error anyone can make. I don't think looking into would be a good use of the time.
But if you wanna look into the writing styles and who would ask Blue those questions, that's fine. We're already doing that with looking into who would talk about Mango being sus and we've come up with Mitch and Bon so far.
But if you wanna look into the writing styles and who would ask Blue those questions, that's fine. We're already doing that with looking into who would talk about Mango being sus and we've come up with Mitch and Bon so far.
J
Not exactly, in some countries the letters Y and Z are switched on the keyboards.
Here in middle europe the Z is in the upper line between the T and the U, if you want to type an A it is really hard to mistype it like this because A and Z are very far away from each other. The Y on the other hand is directly below the letter A which would make a mistype like this way easier. So I would say it is more likely that the user who wrote the comment has to come from a country where the Z is actually under the A instead of the Y.
Here in middle europe the Z is in the upper line between the T and the U, if you want to type an A it is really hard to mistype it like this because A and Z are very far away from each other. The Y on the other hand is directly below the letter A which would make a mistype like this way easier. So I would say it is more likely that the user who wrote the comment has to come from a country where the Z is actually under the A instead of the Y.
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...a-game-date-a-live.24470/page-78#post-2719605
It does say that the red mafia had a failed kill on night 1 but then again Nana's role doesn't have anything to save her from the kill.
They might have been blocked/re-directed or Nana got protected. I'm just thinking how mafia can have the foresight to recognize Nana as a threat before the chat leaks happened. Gotta check her activity on day 1.
It does say that the red mafia had a failed kill on night 1 but then again Nana's role doesn't have anything to save her from the kill.
They might have been blocked/re-directed or Nana got protected. I'm just thinking how mafia can have the foresight to recognize Nana as a threat before the chat leaks happened. Gotta check her activity on day 1.
I could mess up numbers, but that's my point.
Zolo gets cfd, mafia talks about moving Mitch's vote (who hasn't voted) on Pero (2nd wagon). After that Nana revealed leaks. It doesn't say she would leak info from D2/N1, right? So they may as well be from D1.
If they had vote steal DP ability and were able to move town Mitch vote D1 to Pero to save Zolo (or at least believed so), then they should be able to move Fuji's vote for example. Person who voted Zolo. That would give Pero +1 vote and -1 for Zolo. Instead they're talking about moving someone who hasn't voted on Pero. Meaning +1 to Pero and no change for Zolo. If that's manipulation of towns vote, why inactive Mitch?
Now if Mitch is their teammate and their logic was "come on, if he was there, he'd vote pero to save Zolo, let's use his vote power", that makes more sense to me personally.
You mean him going after Mango and just being "there"? Well, that certainly doesn't help, darling
Zolo gets cfd, mafia talks about moving Mitch's vote (who hasn't voted) on Pero (2nd wagon). After that Nana revealed leaks. It doesn't say she would leak info from D2/N1, right? So they may as well be from D1.
If they had vote steal DP ability and were able to move town Mitch vote D1 to Pero to save Zolo (or at least believed so), then they should be able to move Fuji's vote for example. Person who voted Zolo. That would give Pero +1 vote and -1 for Zolo. Instead they're talking about moving someone who hasn't voted on Pero. Meaning +1 to Pero and no change for Zolo. If that's manipulation of towns vote, why inactive Mitch?
Now if Mitch is their teammate and their logic was "come on, if he was there, he'd vote pero to save Zolo, let's use his vote power", that makes more sense to me personally.
You mean him going after Mango and just being "there"? Well, that certainly doesn't help, darling
J
Forget what I wrote about the keyboard settings by the way, Nana wrote in one of her posts that she rephrased the chat leaks, so all my efforts to find out something about the person who wrote that sentence were for nothing, as the one who was making the typo was simply Nana herself :(
Here is what she wrote again:
Maf1
"X kill nana"
"X we should invest or rb mango he seems sus might be third"
"redirect doesn't matter who its used on, how about juliet to cal?"
Maf2
"We also czn use mitch’s vote even though he didnt vote? If so also move that to pero"
More info than I thought:
- there was definitely a redirection involved at maf1
- Nana suspected Ekko hard for having tmi as she believed Ekko could tell which of those two has to be red maf and which has to be purple maf
- as a townie or an indie you should indeed not be able to tell from this which one is red maf and which one is purple
- "might be third" and Gambit talking about a "thirdie" seems to match up, seeing this I understand now why Gambit looks sus to others
- Juliet and Cal can´t be members of Maf1, as Maf1 planned to do some redirection ability to them
- Mitch and Pero can´t be members of Maf2, in my opinion Mitch was used to move a vote on Pero, it seems Maf2 wanted to get Pero lynched
- There is no Maf3, so AST probably is an indie / third party faction?
From what I can see from that chat leaks, I think that Gambit could be Maf1
And Charlie could be Maf2, as we know Rottkins was town, so the discussion about moving a vote to Pero would make sense if that was at an early time of the day when it looked like that it would be a decision between Charlie or Pero and Charlie probably needed to be saved.
After all my suspect list looks like this now:
- Gambit
- Worst
- Charlie
- Kagurashii
- Ekko
- Pot Goblin (as Kagurashii was so eager to find out why Pot Goblin looked more sus to me than T-Pein, those two probably working together?)
Absolutely no clue on:
- Meeyori
- Bonnibel (her last posts look a bit better and the chances of her investigation really being manipulated increased by UwU´s flip)
- Pero
- Dragomir
- Arondight
- BornInAbyss
Fuji is a self-confessed indie I would not want to lynch as he could help town.
Looking townie at this point to me:
- Juliet
- Cal
- Rej (despite not being Kurumi I tend to trust him because we both know the lore and I can tell that he´s trying to be helpful for town)
- Lord Melkor
- Mitch (to me it looks he´s been set up for today´s lynch by people that look more sus to me, like Kagurashii and Charlie)
Most of the townlocks are based on assumptions and feelings as I have no investigation abilities however and it doesn´t help that T-Pein, Nana and Mango all have died either as those were the only one that were either confirmed town or I had a seriously good feeling about in Mango´s case :/
Here is what she wrote again:
Maf1
"X kill nana"
"X we should invest or rb mango he seems sus might be third"
"redirect doesn't matter who its used on, how about juliet to cal?"
Maf2
"We also czn use mitch’s vote even though he didnt vote? If so also move that to pero"
More info than I thought:
- there was definitely a redirection involved at maf1
- Nana suspected Ekko hard for having tmi as she believed Ekko could tell which of those two has to be red maf and which has to be purple maf
- as a townie or an indie you should indeed not be able to tell from this which one is red maf and which one is purple
- "might be third" and Gambit talking about a "thirdie" seems to match up, seeing this I understand now why Gambit looks sus to others
- Juliet and Cal can´t be members of Maf1, as Maf1 planned to do some redirection ability to them
- Mitch and Pero can´t be members of Maf2, in my opinion Mitch was used to move a vote on Pero, it seems Maf2 wanted to get Pero lynched
- There is no Maf3, so AST probably is an indie / third party faction?
From what I can see from that chat leaks, I think that Gambit could be Maf1
And Charlie could be Maf2, as we know Rottkins was town, so the discussion about moving a vote to Pero would make sense if that was at an early time of the day when it looked like that it would be a decision between Charlie or Pero and Charlie probably needed to be saved.
After all my suspect list looks like this now:
- Gambit
- Worst
- Charlie
- Kagurashii
- Ekko
- Pot Goblin (as Kagurashii was so eager to find out why Pot Goblin looked more sus to me than T-Pein, those two probably working together?)
Absolutely no clue on:
- Meeyori
- Bonnibel (her last posts look a bit better and the chances of her investigation really being manipulated increased by UwU´s flip)
- Pero
- Dragomir
- Arondight
- BornInAbyss
Fuji is a self-confessed indie I would not want to lynch as he could help town.
Looking townie at this point to me:
- Juliet
- Cal
- Rej (despite not being Kurumi I tend to trust him because we both know the lore and I can tell that he´s trying to be helpful for town)
- Lord Melkor
- Mitch (to me it looks he´s been set up for today´s lynch by people that look more sus to me, like Kagurashii and Charlie)
Most of the townlocks are based on assumptions and feelings as I have no investigation abilities however and it doesn´t help that T-Pein, Nana and Mango all have died either as those were the only one that were either confirmed town or I had a seriously good feeling about in Mango´s case :/
- Status