[FNZ] Role Madness Valentine's and White's Day Special Mafia Game: Date a Live
- Thread starter Mashiro Blue
- Start date
- Tags al is an adult man blasphemy breedable bring beta back bye kurumi chwaaaan date a live season 4 rocks dont listen to ekko ekko is scum af ekko the game thread clogger finalbeta is god of mafia lynch flowa natsumi best girl origami is a dawg rej is town sandwich with the twins she's dead two days long dayphases are cancer watch ya boy kongming guys where are you kurumi chwaaaaan who is biggest spammer -- ekko or fuji or beta?
- Status
if you submit watching ability on A and later people B and C visit A, you will STILL get results of them visiting A this phase/cycle
and if you submit watching ability on A after B and C visited A this phase/cycle, you will still get result of them visiting A
It doesn't matter what's the order of these actions since by watching A you get information about everyone who visited A during phase/cycle
Is it wrong, darling?
and if you submit watching ability on A after B and C visited A this phase/cycle, you will still get result of them visiting A
It doesn't matter what's the order of these actions since by watching A you get information about everyone who visited A during phase/cycle
Is it wrong, darling?
okay please dont rub it all and throw it as a "tinfoil"
its not a tinfoil melkor. its backed by quotes and facts from the thread
> you never called zolo annoying during the day, yet in ur last second vote on him you call him annoying and useless = bus vote
> when the cfd on zolo was starting, you shaded me and wanted to move from gambit to me. matter of fact u scum read me but u were down to vote gambit who i was scum reading, but when fuji said cfd one of ekko/zolo, u were definitly game for ekko and not zolo, despite zolo being annoying and useless as you say.
> you have 0 meaningful interactions with uwu, who is also inactive, fluffy, and useless this game. around the cfd time he wanted to vote me too and u just stood there and didnt comment on how opportunistic that was, because u wanted to cfd me too and not zolo
> u r one of the players i see missing a kill solely based on activity levels. this is not a strong point, so its not the meat of my argument. but its a point nontheless
~♡
its not a tinfoil melkor. its backed by quotes and facts from the thread
> you never called zolo annoying during the day, yet in ur last second vote on him you call him annoying and useless = bus vote
> when the cfd on zolo was starting, you shaded me and wanted to move from gambit to me. matter of fact u scum read me but u were down to vote gambit who i was scum reading, but when fuji said cfd one of ekko/zolo, u were definitly game for ekko and not zolo, despite zolo being annoying and useless as you say.
> you have 0 meaningful interactions with uwu, who is also inactive, fluffy, and useless this game. around the cfd time he wanted to vote me too and u just stood there and didnt comment on how opportunistic that was, because u wanted to cfd me too and not zolo
> u r one of the players i see missing a kill solely based on activity levels. this is not a strong point, so its not the meat of my argument. but its a point nontheless
~♡
@Fujishiro
But then again you just have to keep one of them alive and it's still just an assumption that Rej might be one of your charas. There's still Tohka and other potential people you can find. So what say? Is there any other reason for you to not lynch Rej if he doesn't turn out to be one of your gang?
But then again you just have to keep one of them alive and it's still just an assumption that Rej might be one of your charas. There's still Tohka and other potential people you can find. So what say? Is there any other reason for you to not lynch Rej if he doesn't turn out to be one of your gang?
Stop dodging the actual point please
We've long since talked about how a character's current alignment matters. Like when we discussed @Charlie's thing. Which is the exact thing that's happening now. A character was mostly evil but turned good later.
You're too focused on a character's past alignment instead of where the current alignment is.
Stop dodging the actual point please
We've long since talked about how a character's current alignment matters. Like when we discussed @Charlie's thing. Which is the exact thing that's happening now. A character was mostly evil but turned good later.
You're too focused on a character's past alignment instead of where the current alignment is.
We saw a Red already die though, I can't be teammates for both.
- Status