[FNZ] Role Madness Valentine's and White's Day Special Mafia Game: Date a Live
- Thread starter Mashiro Blue
- Start date
- Tags al is an adult man blasphemy breedable bring beta back bye kurumi chwaaaan date a live season 4 rocks dont listen to ekko ekko is scum af ekko the game thread clogger finalbeta is god of mafia lynch flowa natsumi best girl origami is a dawg rej is town sandwich with the twins she's dead two days long dayphases are cancer watch ya boy kongming guys where are you kurumi chwaaaaan who is biggest spammer -- ekko or fuji or beta?
- Status
So you're saying that this one shot of yours reveals the 3 players' factions that you choose?
If what you're saying is true then it would be in our best interest to not lynch you today so you can use that ability to clear people next day phase.
Now we're both on each other's shit lists right now but I want to try to level with you here. What is the wording on your roleblock immunity, does it actually say roleblock immune or does it actually specify that your abilities can't be actionless or something like that?
Even if you think everything I've said before was bullshit at the very least consider that I'm not lying about being RB immune and not lying about using the item action (you can confirm with the other r/p/s players that I did in fact win it). Unless yours is worded differently then there's no way that you should've been able to use an invest.
That's the glaring detail.
The tinfoil explanation in my mind is that the DEM ability lets them choose a player that they let the action goes through. Then they can redirect. Redirects can be spammable and not x-shots so it would be possible to always have a redirect on you.
So basically we consider 3 things here.
1. You have a one shot that basically lets you check 3 other player's factions.
2. You have a special immunity that lets you use an action in an actionless day, but got redirected by red
3. DEM has a bastard move alongside their disable that lets them allow someone to use their actions, which led to a redirect.
If what you're saying is true then it would be in our best interest to not lynch you today so you can use that ability to clear people next day phase.
Now we're both on each other's shit lists right now but I want to try to level with you here. What is the wording on your roleblock immunity, does it actually say roleblock immune or does it actually specify that your abilities can't be actionless or something like that?
Even if you think everything I've said before was bullshit at the very least consider that I'm not lying about being RB immune and not lying about using the item action (you can confirm with the other r/p/s players that I did in fact win it). Unless yours is worded differently then there's no way that you should've been able to use an invest.
That's the glaring detail.
The tinfoil explanation in my mind is that the DEM ability lets them choose a player that they let the action goes through. Then they can redirect. Redirects can be spammable and not x-shots so it would be possible to always have a redirect on you.
So basically we consider 3 things here.
1. You have a one shot that basically lets you check 3 other player's factions.
2. You have a special immunity that lets you use an action in an actionless day, but got redirected by red
3. DEM has a bastard move alongside their disable that lets them allow someone to use their actions, which led to a redirect.
@Lord Melkor It's hard for me to remember what your actions were since you posted them in separate posts instead of all together in one post. The abilities I remember you claimed was using a protect which was for night 2 and was the other ability a roleblock and you used that on Meeyori and were those the only abilities you have used at night?
Since players are suspecting you, you said your wu showed up two times and what were those day abilities you used, who did you target, and why did you target this person?
Since players are suspecting you, you said your wu showed up two times and what were those day abilities you used, who did you target, and why did you target this person?
Redirect @Bonnibel's invest, did you even read what I wrote.
As in they were able to allow her invest to go through and redirected it to themselves so it would show as guilty.
As in they were able to allow her invest to go through and redirected it to themselves so it would show as guilty.
''You have a special immunity that lets you use an action in an actionless day, but got redirected by red''
Let me word this better, here's my tinfoil with this new info.
Red's action disabling ability has a hidden feature that lets them choose an action that another player used and decides on whether to let it go through or not. They know for a fact that @Bonnibel has an invest so they want to sow some chaos by allowing that invest to go through while also redirecting it so that the result will scan as guilty.
Bon gets a guilty scan on me and thinks she found scum so she calls me out. Not knowing that she was able to use it because Red let her. So in her mind, she was able to do it because she is RB immune. For me, I know that I am also RB immune and shouldn't scan guilty anymore AND my action was disabled despite being RB immune. So her explanation on why she was able to scan me sets off fire alarms in my head which makes me think she's scum that's lying. Which leads to the big back and forth between us.
What are everyone's thoughts on this?
:zorothink:
Red's action disabling ability has a hidden feature that lets them choose an action that another player used and decides on whether to let it go through or not. They know for a fact that @Bonnibel has an invest so they want to sow some chaos by allowing that invest to go through while also redirecting it so that the result will scan as guilty.
Bon gets a guilty scan on me and thinks she found scum so she calls me out. Not knowing that she was able to use it because Red let her. So in her mind, she was able to do it because she is RB immune. For me, I know that I am also RB immune and shouldn't scan guilty anymore AND my action was disabled despite being RB immune. So her explanation on why she was able to scan me sets off fire alarms in my head which makes me think she's scum that's lying. Which leads to the big back and forth between us.
What are everyone's thoughts on this?
:zorothink:
B
Okay I'll actually try to reason with you for a second and assume everything you said is true. I can't exactly say what it says word for word but I realized it never actually said "immune to roleblocks". it says my action is unstoppable. So my guess is that I was given a powerful invest and in compensation I dont have any other immunities to manipulation, redirection or any other misguiding actions or bulletproof vests + my possibility of death in my one shot. Like I said it's not just to confirm 3 towns. I'd also be willing to take a bullet to reveal someone as scum. Like say if I name two basically confirmed towns + one other person. I might die tomorrow anyway with this information out and it'd be nice to take a break from this with exams coming up
Also just to clarify, I'm not really RB immune, its just my invest action that is. Kind of wanted to be seen by mafia as someone to completely forget about roleblocking. A watcher or a protect would be amazing or even a refill if I survive next night phase.
Honestly the only reason I think I'm an invest that is still alive is because Mafia is shifting the shade on me with redirected results.
I'm thinking they could have even just given me fake results like as if my actions were always guilty instead of redirection.
Also just to clarify, I'm not really RB immune, its just my invest action that is. Kind of wanted to be seen by mafia as someone to completely forget about roleblocking. A watcher or a protect would be amazing or even a refill if I survive next night phase.
Honestly the only reason I think I'm an invest that is still alive is because Mafia is shifting the shade on me with redirected results.
I'm thinking they could have even just given me fake results like as if my actions were always guilty instead of redirection.
I'd say that would do it. So it WAS basically a way for you to do your action despite actions being disabled. Because since it's "unstoppable" it would go through anyway. So it does seem to be actually a case of redirect/tampering here.
I'd say I'm giving you the clear as well, we almost got played like fools but thankfully we figured it out.
Unvote
@Blue @Ratchet
I guess the next step is figuring out the way we use your one-shot as well as the actual lynch target.
I'd say I'm giving you the clear as well, we almost got played like fools but thankfully we figured it out.
Unvote
@Blue @Ratchet
I guess the next step is figuring out the way we use your one-shot as well as the actual lynch target.
- Status