Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1048 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter DarkWitch
- Start date
- Tags #luffy bodies your fav #ulti is best girl #wanji bodies your fav #yamato4nakama #yonko greatness #yonko>admirals #zoro bodies your fave all hail orochi denjiro is back denjiro is no longer missing denjiro vs orochi kaido is the strongest in the world! kaido>mihawk luffy best mc luffy>kid and law luffy>mihawk raizo>denjiro sabo bodies your fave yamato>carrot zoro>kid
- Status
B
Did you just call @YASER?
The wording is misleading here
That's not even late bruh
Just quoting this post so I don't lose it.
The wording is misleading here
okay, you guys are not a bunch of degenerates like me
it's 01:50 here
it's 01:50 here
Just quoting this post so I don't lose it.
damn the drama worstgen vs providers continues...
i think i'm gonna give you my point:
- people shouldn't insult other people online... you don't even know who you're talking about, how can you insult him/her?
- there should be more clarity regarding spoilers, especially in this period after the leak. If Lance doesn't want to post early spoilers for a while, it's ok for me, but he should explain better the reasons why, and should not troll with hints and/or promises a week earlier than spoilers' release (same goes for providers).
i agree with the stricter rules tbh
i think i'm gonna give you my point:
- people shouldn't insult other people online... you don't even know who you're talking about, how can you insult him/her?
- there should be more clarity regarding spoilers, especially in this period after the leak. If Lance doesn't want to post early spoilers for a while, it's ok for me, but he should explain better the reasons why, and should not troll with hints and/or promises a week earlier than spoilers' release (same goes for providers).
i agree with the stricter rules tbh
That's a terrible idea. What you just mentioned is actually the best thing about this forum in comparison to many others.
It's not right for mods to interfere with people's discussions, be it by deleting posts, editing them, blocking users, or locking a thread while at the same time trying to educate a user anyhow. It's okay if they want to argue against something that someone said in a thread, of course, but they should do it just like any regular user does, and not while abusing their mod power to lock the thread so that they can make sure to have the last word.
Of course, I'm not against moderation in a forum, but it should be done just to deal with things like gore, pornography, spamming, and falsification of people's quotes, for example, and never to reject people's views on a matter and how they choose to argue while discussing,
So what do you propose as a solution?
Should they delete posts that you personally consider as insults/"extremism" and care about instead?
Especially because of the woke stuff nowadays, I'm glad that, at least from what I have seen, the mods in this site keep moderation to a minimum, and allow people to insult each other.
The problem of starting to prohibit insults is that people, including mods, are not perfect and can make mistakes of judgement, judging something as offensive even when it may actually be just the truth, that just seems to be offensive to someone who perceives a lie as if it were common sense.
And then it becomes much harder to have a proper discussion about anything, as people are unable to write things just because they may seem offensive to someone else.
There's already an option to ignore users whose posts you don't like in the forum, so there's no reason to delete people's posts just because someone is perceiving it as an insult/"extremism"/trolling, regardless of whether or not such perception is correct.
It's not right for mods to interfere with people's discussions, be it by deleting posts, editing them, blocking users, or locking a thread while at the same time trying to educate a user anyhow. It's okay if they want to argue against something that someone said in a thread, of course, but they should do it just like any regular user does, and not while abusing their mod power to lock the thread so that they can make sure to have the last word.
Of course, I'm not against moderation in a forum, but it should be done just to deal with things like gore, pornography, spamming, and falsification of people's quotes, for example, and never to reject people's views on a matter and how they choose to argue while discussing,
So what do you propose as a solution?
Should they delete posts that you personally consider as insults/"extremism" and care about instead?
Especially because of the woke stuff nowadays, I'm glad that, at least from what I have seen, the mods in this site keep moderation to a minimum, and allow people to insult each other.
The problem of starting to prohibit insults is that people, including mods, are not perfect and can make mistakes of judgement, judging something as offensive even when it may actually be just the truth, that just seems to be offensive to someone who perceives a lie as if it were common sense.
And then it becomes much harder to have a proper discussion about anything, as people are unable to write things just because they may seem offensive to someone else.
There's already an option to ignore users whose posts you don't like in the forum, so there's no reason to delete people's posts just because someone is perceiving it as an insult/"extremism"/trolling, regardless of whether or not such perception is correct.
- Status