Oda: "[Has 19-year-old Sanji attracted to a 16-year-old girl.]"

Westrn Fandom: "OMG! Oda has turned Sanji into a pedophile!"

Toei: "No, this is turning Sanji into a pedophile."
Sanji want's to see Namis body mature, as creepy as that is it's the literal opposite of pedophilia; pedophiles have no interest in post puberty females, they don't want to see a physically mature women, they hunt pre pubescent children. So if Sanji was showing attraction to THIS pre pubescent Nami then that would definitely be pedophilia, but that's not what he said.
 
aCcuSationS aRe nOt ArgUmENts
having a good time "arguing" about this ?
I'm not the one who brought it up, I'm simply responding to a comment that got the definition of Pedophile wrong. It's pretty important for people to know what is and what isn't a Pedophile, this is a serious subject and shouldn't be treated lightly.
 
Sanji wants to ogle a little girl. Toei having Sanji get off to Nami in ALL ages doesn't change the fact they made him a pedo.
He isn't getting off to her, getting off would be him getting nosebleeds and wanting to grope her. All he want's to do is see her go through puberty and become a woman, it's creepy....but not pedophilia. Sanji doesn't want to sleep with child Nami, that's what a Pedo would want to do and the last thing a Pedo would want is to see a female mature and become a woman because he then loses attraction to her as a Pedo is attracted to children.
 
Top