Status
Not open for further replies.

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
your point is stupid because I’m not trying to compel Adam to do anything, I’m not threatening or coercing him in any way, I’m telling him I’ve already sent the kill. With no actual killing action, there’s absolutely nothing in it for me to do this, which makes your logic fallacious, not mine.


"If insults are the only way you're capable of conducting yourself, you have already established that you are out of your depth. My point has nothing to do with whether or not you actually kill Adam. If a kill on Adam goes through, then by claiming said kill you have already told Scum who you are and what you can do. This is information that they did not need to know, as you otherwise could have made any similar point towards Adam without exposing your identity. Hence, by playing fast and loose with information like this, you're approaching it suboptimally. If no kill comes forth, then you serve as a needless distraction, because then your motives for posting like this are brought into question, with no clear town-aligned angle to doing so (unless you claim you were reaction testing, I suppose). And as a matter of course, what fallacy would I be employing in your given example, in your opinion?"​
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
So you want to be a facetious douche? Cool. When you want to play the game and solve slots, you can @ me.


"Firstly, you have been the one antagonistic towards me here, not the other way around. I'm merely gimmick psting as I see fit - my gimmick causes no offence nor does it aim to upset anyone, and I otherwise am engaging with the game on some level, as in, the text content of my posts is not mere fluff (fully, at least). Secondly, I've claimed Indie. You can assume then that my interests will be more selfishly motivated, and I will not have a great deal of interest in solving slots."​
 


"If insults are the only way you're capable of conducting yourself, you have already established that you are out of your depth. My point has nothing to do with whether or not you actually kill Adam. If a kill on Adam goes through, then by claiming said kill you have already told Scum who you are and what you can do. This is information that they did not need to know, as you otherwise could have made any similar point towards Adam without exposing your identity. Hence, by playing fast and loose with information like this, you're approaching it suboptimally. If no kill comes forth, then you serve as a needless distraction, because then your motives for posting like this are brought into question, with no clear town-aligned angle to doing so (unless you claim you were reaction testing, I suppose). And as a matter of course, what fallacy would I be employing in your given example, in your opinion?"​
im not insulting you, I’m saying your logic is bad, which it is. If you are incapable of separating yourself from that, that’s a you issue.

Im perfectly happy for scum to know who I am and what I can do, because they can’t do anything about it. Therefore drawing hostile actions is a net positive, and if they now target someone else, we’ll that’s a win to me too as it thins PoE for me.

Besides, no one gives an iota what you think is optimal or not, stick to collecting mcmuffins. Before you reply, just remember only one of us is privy to my role sheet, and it isn’t you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top