Yeah, I give up. You guys are incapable of reading my points and getting the order of things right.
Flower this was your conclusion:
"So yes, he factually didn‘t provide any clear reads and was just sheeping"
Your work towards the conclusion however showed that this was demonstrably untrue
Yet you've concluded it anyway. This is scummy.
Someone said earlier which I agree with that coming to a conclusion and working backward is a scummy thing to do because it shows you have an agenda. I think your agenda here is to make Gram look bad and that's what your conclusion presents, the fact he does provide clear reads and you know he does tells me that you're full of shir