[FNZ] Super Role Madness One Piece Mafia Ultimate
- Thread starter Ariess
- Start date
- Tags dont refill flowa hoes flowa and fuji are worse than kekko kaido>flower kekko and migraine kekko is back at spamming kekko the fun buster kekko you are a walking meme kekko you are the worst long live the carrot union mafia scared of flowa and muu only pussys are not policylynching pathetic kekkoillogix protownindiesshouldnotexist ratchet is betatier where are you carrot? who stole my muffins
- Status
@Peroroncino do it for Bone Daddy.
I got that route.
yes thats the intention behind it
u assumed it was not about my activity level when it purely was
instead u made it sound like im aware that my posts will look suspicious. when that was no way near the intention of it
thats the whole point.
added to this post. thats a double twist / assumption from u now cuz i never tried to switch ur argument towards one involving my activity levels. instead the point was to clearly call u out for the lack of mentioning my activity level in your assumption regarding the 0.001% posts
i obviously disagree with you saying that my post is about me being worried that my posts will look suspicious. but im not gna try to convince u on that, nor is that an argument. i strictly deny it. nothing to argue. the argument is the lack of mention of activity in that assumption u made, even tho thats the whole motive of my posts
which brings us back again to: why r u making assumptions with no basis behind it / without asking me about it first. thats twisting / assuming stuff
and uve done it again here by telling me that im directing ur post towards mention of activity when im directing it towards the lack of mention of activity
u assumed it was not about my activity level when it purely was
instead u made it sound like im aware that my posts will look suspicious. when that was no way near the intention of it
thats the whole point.
added to this post. thats a double twist / assumption from u now cuz i never tried to switch ur argument towards one involving my activity levels. instead the point was to clearly call u out for the lack of mentioning my activity level in your assumption regarding the 0.001% posts
i obviously disagree with you saying that my post is about me being worried that my posts will look suspicious. but im not gna try to convince u on that, nor is that an argument. i strictly deny it. nothing to argue. the argument is the lack of mention of activity in that assumption u made, even tho thats the whole motive of my posts
which brings us back again to: why r u making assumptions with no basis behind it / without asking me about it first. thats twisting / assuming stuff
and uve done it again here by telling me that im directing ur post towards mention of activity when im directing it towards the lack of mention of activity
- Status